S1 File - by Yonghui Zhang (279832)

“…The CSPM, driven by the optimized CSPs, is then evaluated against two independent phenological datasets from Exp. 2 and Exp. 4 described in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0302098#pone.0302098.t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>. Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R²), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”

Detailed information on field experiments. by Yonghui Zhang (279832)

“…The CSPM, driven by the optimized CSPs, is then evaluated against two independent phenological datasets from Exp. 2 and Exp. 4 described in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0302098#pone.0302098.t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>. Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R²), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”

List of symbols used in this study. by Yonghui Zhang (279832)

“…The CSPM, driven by the optimized CSPs, is then evaluated against two independent phenological datasets from Exp. 2 and Exp. 4 described in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0302098#pone.0302098.t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>. Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R²), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”

Data sources for calibration and evaluation. by Yonghui Zhang (279832)

“…The CSPM, driven by the optimized CSPs, is then evaluated against two independent phenological datasets from Exp. 2 and Exp. 4 described in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0302098#pone.0302098.t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>. Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R²), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”

Mean scores and 95% CIs according to SARS-CoV-2 infection status and work-related determinants. by A. H. Ayesha Lavell (16734002)

Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of immediate antiretroviral therapy initiation for treatment of HIV infection in Côte d’Ivoire: A model-based analysis by Eric N. Ouattara (6890174)

Volcano plot illustrating increases and decreases in pituitary gene expression in hypoxic versus normoxic fetuses. by Charles E. Wood (513584)

Data_Sheet_2_Decreasing Impatience for Health Outcomes and Its Relation With Healthy Behavior.pdf by Arthur E. Attema (5258222)

Data_Sheet_1_Decreasing Impatience for Health Outcomes and Its Relation With Healthy Behavior.pdf by Arthur E. Attema (5258222)

Study area Jamaica Bay, New York including relevant place names. by Thomas Hopper (3216453)

Scatterplots showing the relationship between anteversion angle (AVA) and mean joint contact forces during the stance phase, and neck-shaft angle (NSA) and mean joint contact force... by Hans Kainz (8459514)

RV-C15 replicates in ciliated epithelial cells leading to decreased CDHR3 levels. by Talita B. Gagliardi (6791720)

Modeling Coastal Vulnerability through Space and Time by Thomas Hopper (3216453)

“…Coastal protective features, ranging from storm surge barriers and levees to natural features (e.g. wetlands), have been promoted to decrease future flood risk to communities in coastal areas around the world. …”

Spontaneous oxycodone withdrawal initially flattens NREM power rhythms, decreases low frequency and increases high frequency power. by Michael Gulledge (20577135)

RV-C15 replicates in ciliated epithelial cells, leading to decreased CDHR3 levels. by Talita B. Gagliardi (6791720)

Mean values (± standard deviation) of liver profile parameters before and after CWI. by Aneta Teległów (9570190)

A. We randomly selected 20 mutually exclusive groups of protein complexes that contained exactly five subunits; we mapped the corresponding gene pairs to SINaTRA scores, and plotte... by Alexandra Jacunski (5665486)

“…Although proteins in the same complex are always enriched for higher SINaTRA score, as complex size increases, complex membership becomes less indicative of two genes being SL. C. We compared the fraction of gene pairs with products in the same vs. different complexes for three SINaTRA cutoffs (0.95, 0.80, 0.50) as well as for all gene pairs. …”

Total soluble protein contents of ovaries from queens sampled at different seasonal time points. by Mark J. Carroll (3605582)

Total lipid contents of fat bodies from queens sampled at different seasonal time points. by Mark J. Carroll (3605582)

Annual treatment frequencies in all eyes. by Yasuyuki Sotani (20114144)

“…<p>The number of anti-VEGF treatments, STTA, MA-PC, PPV, and total treatments (mean ± SD) significantly decreased from 2.6 ± 1.6, 0.3 ± 0.8, 0.6 ± 0.8, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 3.7 ± 1.7 preoperatively to 0.8 ± 1.9, 0.0 ± 0.2, 0.3 ± 1.0, 0.0, and 1.2 ± 2.2; at year 2 to 0.7 ± 2.0, 0.1 ± 0.6, 0.0 ± 0.2, 0.0 ± 0.2, and 1.0 ± 2.1; and at year 3 to 0.9 ± 2.2, 0.0, 0.2 ± 1.0, 0.0 ± 0.2, and 1.1 ± 3.1 (Kruskal–Wallis test, P < 0.001; Dunn’s test, **P < 0.01). …”