Showing 501 - 520 results of 225,304 for search '(( 50 ((ng decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ) OR ( 10 ((nm decrease) OR (a decrease)) ))', query time: 1.39s Refine Results
  1. 501
  2. 502

    TNFα significantly decreases PRLR immunoreactivity in the outer root sheath of hair follicles. by Ewan A. Langan (405804)

    Published 2013
    “…<p>(A) PRLR IR in the outer root sheath of control hair follicles (black arrows) was reduced in comparison PRLR IR after treatment with TNFα at concentrations of (B) 0.5 ng/ml and (C) 5 ng/ml. …”
  3. 503
  4. 504
  5. 505
  6. 506
  7. 507
  8. 508
  9. 509

    Ageing results in an abrupt decrease in overall neurogenesis in the mouse DG. by Joana Gil-Mohapel (462002)

    Published 2013
    “…Scale bars (D, E, G) = 50 µm; scale bar (F) = 5 µm.</p>…”
  10. 510
  11. 511
  12. 512

    <i>roh</i> mutation results in Rh1 decrease. by Yu Huang (15093)

    Published 2015
    “…<p>(A) GFP fluorescence of one-day old wild-type (left panel) and <i>roh</i><sup><i>EY04039</i></sup> (right panel) flies showing a reduction in Rh1-GFP. Scale bar, 50 μm. (B) Western blotting showing decreased Rh1 levels in the <i>roh</i><sup><i>EY04039</i></sup> mutant (<i>ey-flp Rh1</i>::<i>GFP; FRT42D roh</i><sup><i>EY04039</i></sup><i>/ FRT42D GMR-hid CL</i>); the INAD and TRP levels are not affected compared to the wild-type. …”
  13. 513
  14. 514
  15. 515
  16. 516
  17. 517
  18. 518
  19. 519

    The rate of lariat formation is decreased two-fold by isoginkgetin treatment. by Jesse M. Gray (527662)

    Published 2014
    “…(<b>C</b>) Isoginkgetin treatment leads to a decreased rate of lariat formation (* indicates <i>p</i> = 0.02) without affecting exon ligation or excised lariat degradation (<i>p</i> = 0.22, 0.08), with calculations as in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0089673#pone-0089673-g001" target="_blank">Fig. 1</a>. …”
  20. 520

    Zinc exposure decreases NR1 clusters and NMDA currents. by Jia Zhu (135506)

    Published 2012
    “…Scale bar, 50 µm. (B) and (C) show the quantification of (A). …”