Showing 18,021 - 18,040 results of 50,355 for search '(( 50 ((nn decrease) OR (((mean decrease) OR (a decrease)))) ) OR ( 12 m decrease ))', query time: 1.28s Refine Results
  1. 18021
  2. 18022
  3. 18023
  4. 18024
  5. 18025
  6. 18026
  7. 18027
  8. 18028
  9. 18029

    Blood variables at day 1 and 42. by Changhyun Lim (8693979)

    Published 2023
    “…Twenty-four healthy young men (22 ± 2 yrs; BMI = 24.3 ± 2.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were randomly allocated to either a Fortetropin® supplement (FOR-SUPP, n = 12) group consuming 19.8 g/d of FOR or placebo (PLA-SUPP, n = 12) group consuming energy- and macronutrient-matched cheese powder for 6-wk. …”
  10. 18030

    Minimal dataset. by Changhyun Lim (8693979)

    Published 2023
    “…Twenty-four healthy young men (22 ± 2 yrs; BMI = 24.3 ± 2.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were randomly allocated to either a Fortetropin® supplement (FOR-SUPP, n = 12) group consuming 19.8 g/d of FOR or placebo (PLA-SUPP, n = 12) group consuming energy- and macronutrient-matched cheese powder for 6-wk. …”
  11. 18031

    Baseline characteristics of the participants. by Changhyun Lim (8693979)

    Published 2023
    “…Twenty-four healthy young men (22 ± 2 yrs; BMI = 24.3 ± 2.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were randomly allocated to either a Fortetropin® supplement (FOR-SUPP, n = 12) group consuming 19.8 g/d of FOR or placebo (PLA-SUPP, n = 12) group consuming energy- and macronutrient-matched cheese powder for 6-wk. …”
  12. 18032

    Physical activity during each phase. by Changhyun Lim (8693979)

    Published 2023
    “…Twenty-four healthy young men (22 ± 2 yrs; BMI = 24.3 ± 2.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were randomly allocated to either a Fortetropin® supplement (FOR-SUPP, n = 12) group consuming 19.8 g/d of FOR or placebo (PLA-SUPP, n = 12) group consuming energy- and macronutrient-matched cheese powder for 6-wk. …”
  13. 18033
  14. 18034
  15. 18035
  16. 18036
  17. 18037
  18. 18038
  19. 18039
  20. 18040

    CARBON DIOXIDE BIOFIXATION BY Chlorella sp. IN A BUBBLE COLUMN REACTOR AT DIFFERENT FLOW RATES AND CO2 CONCENTRATIONS by Reza Pourjamshidian (7453202)

    Published 2019
    “…Also, limiting CO2 supplementation noticeably decreased biomass concentration. Therefore, the results have shown that a high flow rate and low concentration of CO2 might promote a decrease in CO2 fixation efficiency by Chlorella sp.…”