Image_7_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.PNG by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Image_1_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.PNG by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Image_2_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.PNG by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Audio_3_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.WAV by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Image_6_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.PNG by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Image_5_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.PNG by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Audio_1_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.WAV by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Audio_2_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.WAV by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Video_1_Underwater Acoustic Ecology Metrics in an Alaska Marine Protected Area Reveal Marine Mammal Communication Masking and Management Alternatives.WMV by Christine M. Gabriele (3297708)

“…RA was approximated from the quietest 5th percentile noise statistics based on a year (2011) of continuous audio data from a hydrophone in GBNP, in the frequency bands of whale and seal sounds of interest: humpback “whup” calls (50–700 Hz, 143 dB re 1 μPa source level, SL); humpback song (224–708 Hz, 175 dB SL), and harbor seal roars (4–500 Hz, 144 dB SL). …”

Characterization of super carbonate apatite (sCA). by Xin Wu (10164)

“…The optical density (OD) value of sCA, or sCA+0.5% albumin decreased as pH value decreased. (E) <i>Ex vivo</i> half-lives of naked-siRNA and sCA-siRNA (40 μg) in mouse serum, incubated at 37°C over a period of up to 48 h. …”

The knock-down of DBP5, GLE1 or IPPK affects the different subsets of cytoplasmic mRNA expressions. by Masumi Okamura (5204690)

DataSheet_1_Combined effects of exercise and immuno-chemotherapy treatments on tumor growth in MC38 colorectal cancer-bearing mice.docx by Manon Gouez (17969798)

“…TRT-EXE and EXE groups were submitted to 50 minutes of treadmill exercise before each treatment administration. …”

Epigenome-wide association studies of occupational exposure to benzene and formaldehyde by Rachael V. Phillips (6880574)

“…In the benzene EWAS, we found genome-wide significant alterations, i.e., FWER-controlled <i>P</i>-values <0.05, in the mean and variance of methylation at 22 and 318 CpG sites, respectively, and in mean methylation of a large genomic region. …”

Table_1_Favorable Effects of Tacrolimus Monotherapy on Myasthenia Gravis Patients.DOCX by Zhirong Fan (9566711)

“…QMG scores significantly decreased at 6 and 12 months, with mean differences and 95% CIs of −4.67(−6.88, −2.45) and −5.77 (−7.55, −4.00), respectively. …”

Effects of conditional p38α deletion on anti-GBM nephritis. by Ralf Müller (118397)

“…<p>(A) p38MAPKα deletion is depending on tissue and reaches from 50–100%. …”

Novel Nuclear Factor-KappaB Targeting Peptide Suppresses β-Amyloid Induced Inflammatory and Apoptotic Responses in Neuronal Cells - Fig 6 by Mythily Srinivasan (3233949)

“…<p>Effect of GILZ analog (GA) treatment on human fetal brain cells (HFB): (A,B): Select GA decrease metabolic activity in Aβ_1–42 exposed HFB. …”

Seizure changes during study phases. by Mark Bodner (33604)

“…It can be seen from the graphs that while both groups of subjects exhibited a significant reduction in seizures, that subjects with idiopathic seizures exhibited a greater decrease in both treatment and follow-up years than those with symptomatic seizures.…”

WIKI4 inhibits the functional outcomes of Wnt/ß-catenin signaling. by Richard G. James (114424)

“…In <b>B-F</b>, LCM = control L cell CM, WNT3A = Wnt3a CM; both 50% (vol/vol) in KSR medium.…”

The distribution of Tbr2+ mitoses shifts to the outer subventricular zone (oSVZ) during early stages of cortical development in macaque, but not in ferret or rat. by Verónica Martínez-Cerdeño (155789)

“…There was a steady decrease in the proportion of Tbr2+ divisions occurring in the iSVZ. …”

The Antihelmintic Drug Pyrvinium Pamoate Targets Aggressive Breast Cancer by Wei Xu (28953)

“…A decrease in activity of the TIC surrogate aldehyde dehydrogenase was observed in PP-treated cells, and inhibition of WNT signaling by PP was associated with down-regulation of a panel of markers associated with epithelial-mesenchymal transition. …”