Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
701
-
702
-
703
-
704
-
705
-
706
-
707
-
708
-
709
-
710
Topography of the relationship between the change in alpha power decrease and the change in M50 gating ratio.
Published 2013“…B: Relationship between change in alpha power decrease (abscissa, negative values indicate improvement) and pre-to-post-training change in M50 gating ratio (ordinate, positive values indicate changes towards normal, that is, smaller gating ratio) by patient training group based on the ROI in 4A.…”
-
711
-
712
-
713
-
714
-
715
Diagnostic performance of blood parameters to discriminate abnormal from normal MAD activity (A) and decreased from absent MAD activity (B).
Published 2015“…(B) Classifiers for the differentiation of Absent (n = 5) from Decreased (n = 6) MAD activity. 50% PMP: 50% from predicted maximal power (see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0132972#sec006" target="_blank">Methods</a>), R: Recovery from exercise, Se: Sensibility, Sp: Specificity, Acc: Accuracy, PPV: Positive predictive value, NPV: Negative predictive value, LR+: Positive likelihood ratio, LR-: Negative likelihood ratio, DOR: Diagnostic odds ratio, NC: Not calculable.…”
-
716
-
717
-
718
TUNEL staining of testis tissues.
Published 2025“…Apoptosis increased following PM2.5 exposure and decreased after vitamin administration. …”
-
719
-
720
Likelihood of a decrease in runoff (a), an increase in runoff (b) and a severe change in ecosystems (c) for selected Δ<em>T</em><sub>g</sub> levels
Published 2013“…Other regions would be affected at higher Δ<em>T</em><sub>g</sub> levels, with lower intensity or with lower confidence. In total, mean global warming levels of 2 ° C, 3.5 ° C and 5 ° C are simulated to expose an additional 8%, 11% and 13% of the world population to new or aggravated water scarcity, respectively, with >50% confidence (while ~1.3 billion people already live in water-scarce regions). …”