Showing 401 - 420 results of 63,271 for search '(( 50 ((nn decrease) OR (a decrease)) ) OR ( 5 ((wt decrease) OR (we decrease)) ))', query time: 1.16s Refine Results
  1. 401

    Evaluation index results for the JS-10 phantom. by Masakazu Tsujimoto (22339504)

    Published 2025
    “…In the NEMA body phantom, contrast improved with acquisition times of ≥30 s/view, and the CNR increased as noise declined with longer acquisition times. At ≥50 s/view, variation in the maximum and mean SUVs decreased, with the RSE remaining below 5%. …”
  2. 402

    NEMA IEC body phantom. by Masakazu Tsujimoto (22339504)

    Published 2025
    “…In the NEMA body phantom, contrast improved with acquisition times of ≥30 s/view, and the CNR increased as noise declined with longer acquisition times. At ≥50 s/view, variation in the maximum and mean SUVs decreased, with the RSE remaining below 5%. …”
  3. 403

    Relationship between contrast, noise, and CNR. by Masakazu Tsujimoto (22339504)

    Published 2025
    “…In the NEMA body phantom, contrast improved with acquisition times of ≥30 s/view, and the CNR increased as noise declined with longer acquisition times. At ≥50 s/view, variation in the maximum and mean SUVs decreased, with the RSE remaining below 5%. …”
  4. 404

    JS-10 phantom. by Masakazu Tsujimoto (22339504)

    Published 2025
    “…In the NEMA body phantom, contrast improved with acquisition times of ≥30 s/view, and the CNR increased as noise declined with longer acquisition times. At ≥50 s/view, variation in the maximum and mean SUVs decreased, with the RSE remaining below 5%. …”
  5. 405

    The raw data used for the analyses in this study. by Masakazu Tsujimoto (22339504)

    Published 2025
    “…In the NEMA body phantom, contrast improved with acquisition times of ≥30 s/view, and the CNR increased as noise declined with longer acquisition times. At ≥50 s/view, variation in the maximum and mean SUVs decreased, with the RSE remaining below 5%. …”
  6. 406
  7. 407
  8. 408
  9. 409
  10. 410
  11. 411

    Baseline sleep/wake characterizations of WT and W/W<sup>v</sup> mice. by Sachiko Chikahisa (417256)

    Published 2013
    “…*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, WT versus W/W<sup>v</sup>. All data is expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 8/group).…”
  12. 412
  13. 413
  14. 414
  15. 415
  16. 416
  17. 417
  18. 418
  19. 419
  20. 420