Search alternatives:
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
-
481
-
482
-
483
-
484
-
485
-
486
-
487
The corticospinal pathway is more susceptible to iterative stimulation and have lower conduction velocity in <i>taiep</i> rats.
Published 2024“…<p><b>A)</b> Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) induced by iterative electrical stimulation on the cerebral cortex showed a decrease in their amplitudes when increasing the stimulation rate from 5 to 30 Hz in <i>taiep</i> (blue squares), but not in WT rats (empty circles). …”
-
488
-
489
-
490
-
491
Repetitive stress induces a decrease in sound-evoked activity.
Published 2025“…<p>(a) Left: noise-evoked activity rates at different noise intensities for chronically tracked PPys cells in baseline and repeated stress conditions (<i>N</i> = 5 mice, <i>n</i> = 285 neurons, mean ± SE). Activity rates decreased during repeated stress compared to baseline (2-way ANOVA, condition F = 185.6, <i>p</i> = 4.8 × 10<sup>−42</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 10.37, <i>p</i> = 9.3 × 10<sup>−21</sup>, nested ANOVA (mouse nested within session), condition F = 174, <i>p</i> = 1.5 × 10<sup>−39</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 12.7, <i>p</i> = 2 × 10<sup>−26</sup>, post hoc for each level baseline versus repetitive stress <i>p</i> < 0.01 for all levels above 50 dB, all Bonferroni corrected). …”
-
492
Image_1_Direct Current Stimulation Disrupts Endothelial Glycocalyx and Tight Junctions of the Blood-Brain Barrier in vitro.tif
Published 2021“…After confluence, 0.1–1 mA/cm<sup>2</sup> DCS was applied for 5 and 10 min. TEER and P to dextran-70k of the in vitro BBB were measured, HS (heparan sulfate) and hyaluronic acid (HA) of EG was immuno-stained and quantified, as well as the tight junction ZO-1. …”
-
493
Image_4_Direct Current Stimulation Disrupts Endothelial Glycocalyx and Tight Junctions of the Blood-Brain Barrier in vitro.tif
Published 2021“…After confluence, 0.1–1 mA/cm<sup>2</sup> DCS was applied for 5 and 10 min. TEER and P to dextran-70k of the in vitro BBB were measured, HS (heparan sulfate) and hyaluronic acid (HA) of EG was immuno-stained and quantified, as well as the tight junction ZO-1. …”
-
494
Image_2_Direct Current Stimulation Disrupts Endothelial Glycocalyx and Tight Junctions of the Blood-Brain Barrier in vitro.tif
Published 2021“…After confluence, 0.1–1 mA/cm<sup>2</sup> DCS was applied for 5 and 10 min. TEER and P to dextran-70k of the in vitro BBB were measured, HS (heparan sulfate) and hyaluronic acid (HA) of EG was immuno-stained and quantified, as well as the tight junction ZO-1. …”
-
495
Image_3_Direct Current Stimulation Disrupts Endothelial Glycocalyx and Tight Junctions of the Blood-Brain Barrier in vitro.tif
Published 2021“…After confluence, 0.1–1 mA/cm<sup>2</sup> DCS was applied for 5 and 10 min. TEER and P to dextran-70k of the in vitro BBB were measured, HS (heparan sulfate) and hyaluronic acid (HA) of EG was immuno-stained and quantified, as well as the tight junction ZO-1. …”
-
496
-
497
-
498
-
499
-
500