Search alternatives:
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
ng decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
ng decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
-
241
-
242
Treatment outcomes.
Published 2023“…The rate of local recurrence in the included studies ranged from 9.4% to 78%, and local control progression-free survival ranged from 1 to 31 months. The total QoL decreased one week after the cryoablation procedure (-3.08 [95% Confidence interval: -4.65, -1.50], p-value <0.01) but increased one month (5.69 [3.99, 7.39], p-value <0.01) and three months (3.75 [2.25, 5.24], p-value <0.01) after the procedure.…”
-
243
Quality assessment of included papers.
Published 2023“…The rate of local recurrence in the included studies ranged from 9.4% to 78%, and local control progression-free survival ranged from 1 to 31 months. The total QoL decreased one week after the cryoablation procedure (-3.08 [95% Confidence interval: -4.65, -1.50], p-value <0.01) but increased one month (5.69 [3.99, 7.39], p-value <0.01) and three months (3.75 [2.25, 5.24], p-value <0.01) after the procedure.…”
-
244
Basic characteristics of the included studies.
Published 2023“…The rate of local recurrence in the included studies ranged from 9.4% to 78%, and local control progression-free survival ranged from 1 to 31 months. The total QoL decreased one week after the cryoablation procedure (-3.08 [95% Confidence interval: -4.65, -1.50], p-value <0.01) but increased one month (5.69 [3.99, 7.39], p-value <0.01) and three months (3.75 [2.25, 5.24], p-value <0.01) after the procedure.…”
-
245
-
246
-
247
Flow diagram of this study.
Published 2023“…The risk of in-stent restenosis of more than 50% was significantly decreased when TC/HDL-C ratio (odds ratio [OR] 0.22, [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05–0.87]) and LDL-C/HDL-C ratio (OR 0.23, [95% CI 0.06–0.93]) decreased or when HDL-C levels (OR 0.10, [95% CI 0.02–0.63]) were increased at 12 months compared with baseline measurements.…”
-
248
-
249
-
250
-
251
-
252
-
253
Diabetic kidney shows decreased klotho expression.
Published 2021“…<p>(a) Representative images of the kidney from normal and diabetic biopsies showing the decreased klotho expression in diabetic podocytes by IHC. …”
-
254
Predicting pattern diversity decreases as a function of and .
Published 2025“…<p>For 50 Erdős-Rényi graphs with 30 nodes and 70 edges, we split the results into two columns according to the two initial degenerate unstable eigenmodes + : on the left, (if ), and on the right, (if ). …”
-
255
-
256
-
257
-
258
-
259
S1 File -
Published 2024“…The CSPM, driven by the optimized CSPs, is then evaluated against two independent phenological datasets from Exp. 2 and Exp. 4 described in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0302098#pone.0302098.t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>. Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”
-
260
Detailed information on field experiments.
Published 2024“…The CSPM, driven by the optimized CSPs, is then evaluated against two independent phenological datasets from Exp. 2 and Exp. 4 described in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0302098#pone.0302098.t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>. Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”