Showing 5,461 - 5,480 results of 60,794 for search '(( 50 ((ns decrease) OR (a decrease)) ) OR ( 5 ((we decrease) OR (nn decrease)) ))', query time: 1.43s Refine Results
  1. 5461
  2. 5462

    Data_Sheet_1_Improvements in mental health associated with increased electronic communication and deterioration in physical health in adults aged 50+ during the COVID-19 pandemic.D... by Shay Musbat (18861388)

    Published 2024
    “…</p>Objective<p>This longitudinal study aims to provide a quantitative analysis of the COVID-19 impact on the physical, mental, and social parameters in adults aged 50 and older before, in the early stages, and during the COVID-19 pandemic.…”
  3. 5463
  4. 5464

    Table 1_Microglial adenosine A2A receptor in the paraventricular thalamic nucleus regulates pain sensation and analgesic effects independent of opioid and cannabinoid receptors.doc... by Yiping Cao (1229856)

    Published 2024
    “…Pharmacological activation of local PVT A<sub>2A</sub>R with its agonist CGS21680 induced significantly decreased 50% paw withdrawal threshold (50%PWTs) and paw withdrawal latency (PWLs), as measured by the Von Frey test and Hargreaves test in adult mice. …”
  5. 5465

    Image 1_Microglial adenosine A2A receptor in the paraventricular thalamic nucleus regulates pain sensation and analgesic effects independent of opioid and cannabinoid receptors.tif by Yiping Cao (1229856)

    Published 2024
    “…Pharmacological activation of local PVT A<sub>2A</sub>R with its agonist CGS21680 induced significantly decreased 50% paw withdrawal threshold (50%PWTs) and paw withdrawal latency (PWLs), as measured by the Von Frey test and Hargreaves test in adult mice. …”
  6. 5466

    Image 2_Microglial adenosine A2A receptor in the paraventricular thalamic nucleus regulates pain sensation and analgesic effects independent of opioid and cannabinoid receptors.tif by Yiping Cao (1229856)

    Published 2024
    “…Pharmacological activation of local PVT A<sub>2A</sub>R with its agonist CGS21680 induced significantly decreased 50% paw withdrawal threshold (50%PWTs) and paw withdrawal latency (PWLs), as measured by the Von Frey test and Hargreaves test in adult mice. …”
  7. 5467
  8. 5468
  9. 5469

    LSTM model structure. by Yeongha Kim (12174924)

    Published 2023
    “…We compare the prediction error of the existing and proposed models with the COVID-19 prediction results reported from five US states: California, Texas, Florida, New York, and Illinois. …”
  10. 5470

    Proposed model architecture. by Yeongha Kim (12174924)

    Published 2023
    “…We compare the prediction error of the existing and proposed models with the COVID-19 prediction results reported from five US states: California, Texas, Florida, New York, and Illinois. …”
  11. 5471

    Week 3 prediction using Seq2Seq model. by Yeongha Kim (12174924)

    Published 2023
    “…We compare the prediction error of the existing and proposed models with the COVID-19 prediction results reported from five US states: California, Texas, Florida, New York, and Illinois. …”
  12. 5472

    Week 1 prediction using Seq2Seq model. by Yeongha Kim (12174924)

    Published 2023
    “…We compare the prediction error of the existing and proposed models with the COVID-19 prediction results reported from five US states: California, Texas, Florida, New York, and Illinois. …”
  13. 5473

    Compare related work with our research. by Yeongha Kim (12174924)

    Published 2023
    “…We compare the prediction error of the existing and proposed models with the COVID-19 prediction results reported from five US states: California, Texas, Florida, New York, and Illinois. …”
  14. 5474

    Week 3 prediction using LSTM model. by Yeongha Kim (12174924)

    Published 2023
    “…We compare the prediction error of the existing and proposed models with the COVID-19 prediction results reported from five US states: California, Texas, Florida, New York, and Illinois. …”
  15. 5475

    Seq2Seq model structure. by Yeongha Kim (12174924)

    Published 2023
    “…We compare the prediction error of the existing and proposed models with the COVID-19 prediction results reported from five US states: California, Texas, Florida, New York, and Illinois. …”
  16. 5476

    Week 2 prediction using Seq2Seq model. by Yeongha Kim (12174924)

    Published 2023
    “…We compare the prediction error of the existing and proposed models with the COVID-19 prediction results reported from five US states: California, Texas, Florida, New York, and Illinois. …”
  17. 5477

    Week 1 prediction using LSTM model. by Yeongha Kim (12174924)

    Published 2023
    “…We compare the prediction error of the existing and proposed models with the COVID-19 prediction results reported from five US states: California, Texas, Florida, New York, and Illinois. …”
  18. 5478

    Week 2 prediction using LSTM model. by Yeongha Kim (12174924)

    Published 2023
    “…We compare the prediction error of the existing and proposed models with the COVID-19 prediction results reported from five US states: California, Texas, Florida, New York, and Illinois. …”
  19. 5479

    Google trends keywords used to train the model. by Yeongha Kim (12174924)

    Published 2023
    “…We compare the prediction error of the existing and proposed models with the COVID-19 prediction results reported from five US states: California, Texas, Florida, New York, and Illinois. …”
  20. 5480

    Seq2Seq model structure. by Yeongha Kim (12174924)

    Published 2023
    “…We compare the prediction error of the existing and proposed models with the COVID-19 prediction results reported from five US states: California, Texas, Florida, New York, and Illinois. …”