Search alternatives:
ns decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search)
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), awd decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
ns decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search)
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), awd decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
381
-
382
-
383
-
384
-
385
Baseline sleep/wake characterizations of WT and W/W<sup>v</sup> mice.
Published 2013“…*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, WT versus W/W<sup>v</sup>. All data is expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 8/group).…”
-
386
-
387
-
388
-
389
-
390
-
391
-
392
-
393
-
394
-
395
-
396
-
397
-
398
Regions (α-helices, β-sheets, and loops) showing an average increase or decrease of RMSF in the MTs compared to the WT; RMSF of a particular structure is taken to be increased or decreased if there is an average change in RMSF of >0.03 nm in at least ≥50% of its residues.
Published 2014“…<p>Regions (α-helices, β-sheets, and loops) showing an average increase or decrease of RMSF in the MTs compared to the WT; RMSF of a particular structure is taken to be increased or decreased if there is an average change in RMSF of >0.03 nm in at least ≥50% of its residues.…”
-
399
-
400