Search alternatives:
ns decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), awd decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
ns decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
wt decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), awd decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
15061
Five years comparation of efficacy and safety after ICL-V4c implantation for high and super high myopia correction
Published 2024“…No significant difference of ECD was found in the high (2823.45 ± 274.75 cells/mm<sup>2</sup>) and super-high myopia (2856.71 ± 323.53cells/mm<sup>2</sup>) at the visit of 5 years. Compared to baseline, we observed a significant increase in IOP at the 1-week follow-up, which decreased significantly at the one-month visit. …”
-
15062
-
15063
List of Included studies.
Published 2025“…The results show that one month after the NSPT, there was no significant difference in the mean visfatin level of GCF (SMD: -3.91, 95%CI: -9.83, 2.01, p = 0.195, I-square, 96.6%, random effect model, n = 2) and serum (SMD: -0.33, 95%CI: -0.98, 0.33, p = 0.332, fixed effect model, n = 1), but 2, 3 and 6 months after NSPT, the mean visfatin level of GCF and serum decreased significantly. There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
15064
The search strategy in three databases.
Published 2025“…The results show that one month after the NSPT, there was no significant difference in the mean visfatin level of GCF (SMD: -3.91, 95%CI: -9.83, 2.01, p = 0.195, I-square, 96.6%, random effect model, n = 2) and serum (SMD: -0.33, 95%CI: -0.98, 0.33, p = 0.332, fixed effect model, n = 1), but 2, 3 and 6 months after NSPT, the mean visfatin level of GCF and serum decreased significantly. There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
15065
NIH score.
Published 2025“…The results show that one month after the NSPT, there was no significant difference in the mean visfatin level of GCF (SMD: -3.91, 95%CI: -9.83, 2.01, p = 0.195, I-square, 96.6%, random effect model, n = 2) and serum (SMD: -0.33, 95%CI: -0.98, 0.33, p = 0.332, fixed effect model, n = 1), but 2, 3 and 6 months after NSPT, the mean visfatin level of GCF and serum decreased significantly. There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
15066
List of excluded studies.
Published 2025“…The results show that one month after the NSPT, there was no significant difference in the mean visfatin level of GCF (SMD: -3.91, 95%CI: -9.83, 2.01, p = 0.195, I-square, 96.6%, random effect model, n = 2) and serum (SMD: -0.33, 95%CI: -0.98, 0.33, p = 0.332, fixed effect model, n = 1), but 2, 3 and 6 months after NSPT, the mean visfatin level of GCF and serum decreased significantly. There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
15067
Extreme acid survival of <i>S</i>. Typhi strains depends upon the pH of the pre-growth media.
Published 2016“…Ty21a with pGad showed good survival when bacteria were pre-grown in mildly acidic pH media and in commercial unbuffered TSB, with the <i>p</i> value significance between Ty21apGad and Ty21a EV at pH 4.5, 5.5, 6.5 and 7.2 (unbuffered) are 0.0236, 0.0251, 0.0230 and 0.0468, respectively; however following pre-growth at pH 7.5, acid survival was decreased by ~ 3 logs (non-significant <i>p</i> value 0.1827). …”
-
15068
αvβ5 Integrin/FAK/PGC-1α Pathway Confers Protective Effects on Retinal Pigment Epithelium
Published 2015“…To elucidate the mechanism, siRNAs against β5 integrin, CD36, Mer tyrosine kinase (MerTK), and Atg5, blocking antibodies against CD36 and MerTK, and a specific inhibitor for focal adhesion kinase (FAK) were used. …”
-
15069
Slope coefficients of herbivore density (individuals.km<sup>-2</sup>) along a gradient of increasing woody cover (e.g. for a 10% increase in woody cover on the basalts, the impala...
Published 2015“…</p><p>This illustrates that browsers increase with increasing woody cover, whilst most grazers decrease. (**** 0.01% significance level; *** 0.1% significance level; ** 1% significance level; * 5% significance level; when applying a Bonferroni correction for 24 tests, only species indicated as significant at the ≤0.1% level will remain significant at the 5% level).…”
-
15070
-
15071
-
15072
-
15073
-
15074
-
15075
-
15076
-
15077
-
15078
Presentation_1_Risk of severe COVID-19 infection in persons with diabetes during the first and second waves in Denmark: A nationwide cohort study.pdf
Published 2022“…However, when mortality was restricted to the hospitalized population, the crude mortality fell from 26.8% to 19.6% in persons with diabetes, while only a minor decrease was seen in persons without diabetes (from 16.7% to 15.5%).…”
-
15079
-
15080
Effects of Prednisolone on Disease Progression in Antiretroviral-Untreated HIV Infection: A 2-Year Randomized, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial
Published 2016“…Secondary endpoints: Prednisolone-treatment decreased immune activation (sCD14, suPAR, CD38/HLA-DR/CD8+) and increased CD4-counts (+77.42 ± 5.70 cells/μl compared to -37.42 ± 10.77 cells/μl under placebo, p < 0.0001). …”