Search alternatives:
ns decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
nm decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
ns decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
nm decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1121
-
1122
-
1123
-
1124
-
1125
-
1126
-
1127
Primers used in this study.
Published 2025“…The overexpression of AGPAT3 in A2780 cells led to increased p-mTOR/mTOR and p-S6K/S6K ratios and increased IC50 values, as shown by RT-qPCR, western blotting, and MTT analysis. …”
-
1128
-
1129
-
1130
NEMA IEC body phantom.
Published 2025“…In conclusion, accurate SUV measurement with ¹²³I-MIBG requires an acquisition time of ≥50 s/view, an SI product of approximately 120, and a Gaussian filter of 10 − 12 mm. …”
-
1131
Relationship between contrast, noise, and CNR.
Published 2025“…In conclusion, accurate SUV measurement with ¹²³I-MIBG requires an acquisition time of ≥50 s/view, an SI product of approximately 120, and a Gaussian filter of 10 − 12 mm. …”
-
1132
The raw data used for the analyses in this study.
Published 2025“…In conclusion, accurate SUV measurement with ¹²³I-MIBG requires an acquisition time of ≥50 s/view, an SI product of approximately 120, and a Gaussian filter of 10 − 12 mm. …”
-
1133
-
1134
-
1135
-
1136
-
1137
-
1138
-
1139
2-CDA decreases PIN 1 protein levels in 7WD10 cells.
Published 2013“…(B) ImageJ quantitation revealed significantly decreased PIN 1 protein levels at 0.1 mM (39%, p<0.001), at 0.5 µM (30%, p<0.001), 1.0 µM (24%, p<0.001), 5.0 µM (19%, p<0.001) and 10.0 µM (29%, p<0.001) compared to untreated control cells n = 4 in each group. *, p<0.05, **, p<0.01, vs. untreated controls.…”
-
1140