Search alternatives:
ns decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
wt decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), awd decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
ns decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
wt decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), awd decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
261
-
262
-
263
-
264
-
265
S1 Data - Synergistic effects of surfactant blends on lignite dust wettability
Published 2025Subjects: -
266
-
267
-
268
-
269
-
270
-
271
LPS-induced decrease in Sp1 DNA binding activity is associated with an increased NF-κB binding activity.
Published 2015“…<p>Wild type (WT) mice were injected with saline (1 ml/kg, Con) or <i>Samonelia Enteritidis</i> LPS (10 mg/kg, i.p.). …”
-
272
FTIR analysis of the <i>f-MWCNTs</i> modified GFRPs composite containing 0.4 wt. % <i>f-MWCNTs</i>.
Published 2022Subjects: -
273
-
274
-
275
-
276
Preserved NSS at 2 and at 24 hours following ischemia and decreased infarct volume in PAR1 KO mice 24 hours following ischemic stroke.
Published 2021“…(C) Total infarct volume is significantly lower in PAR1 KO mice compared to control (t-test, WT = 6, PAR1 KO = 6). (D) Infarct volume decreases as a function of distance from the ischemic core (slices #5&6). …”
-
277
-
278
-
279
CD43<sup>-/-</sup> septic mice exhibit decreased frequencies of apoptotic CD8<sup>+</sup> T<sub>EM</sub> as compared to WT septic mice.
Published 2018“…D) There was a significant decrease in apoptosis of CD44<sup>HI</sup> CD62L<sup>LO</sup> CD8<sup>+</sup> T<sub>EM</sub> in CD43<sup>-/-</sup> septic mice compared to WT septic mice (10.3±1.1 vs 17.9±1.9, p = 0.006). …”
-
280