Impact of 8-MOP concentration (0 ng/ml, 200 ng/ml, or 300 ng/ml) on cellular response after a 2 J/cm² UVA dose. by Marie Laulhé (6416483)

Image_5_Age-Dependent Decrease in the Induction of Regulatory T Cells Is Associated With Decreased Expression of RALDH2 in Mesenteric Lymph Node Dendritic Cells.TIF by Tomohiro Takano (9227690)

The blood plasma, kidney, and brain concentration levels (ng/ml) of GSK360A presented for 5 and 24 hours after GSK360A (30 mg/kg) was administered orally by gavage. by Jin Zhou (90734)

Detection of oxidized proteins by oxyblot in HL-1 cells exposed for 12 or 72h to LG, NG, HG or IHG. by Patrick Mordel (17020879)

Tax expression is associated with decreased cellular motility. by Saumya Ramanayake (7879091)

Image 5_Exploration of the diagnostic and prognostic roles of decreased autoantibodies in lung cancer.tif by Ying Ye (72583)

“…Moreover, 5 of the decreased autoantibodies can also be applied for supervising bone metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma. …”

S1 File - by Yonghui Zhang (279832)

“…The CSPM, driven by the optimized CSPs, is then evaluated against two independent phenological datasets from Exp. 2 and Exp. 4 described in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0302098#pone.0302098.t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>. Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R²), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”

Detailed information on field experiments. by Yonghui Zhang (279832)

“…The CSPM, driven by the optimized CSPs, is then evaluated against two independent phenological datasets from Exp. 2 and Exp. 4 described in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0302098#pone.0302098.t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>. Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R²), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”

List of symbols used in this study. by Yonghui Zhang (279832)

“…The CSPM, driven by the optimized CSPs, is then evaluated against two independent phenological datasets from Exp. 2 and Exp. 4 described in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0302098#pone.0302098.t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>. Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R²), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”

Data sources for calibration and evaluation. by Yonghui Zhang (279832)

“…The CSPM, driven by the optimized CSPs, is then evaluated against two independent phenological datasets from Exp. 2 and Exp. 4 described in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0302098#pone.0302098.t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>. Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R²), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”

Table5_Effects of exercise modalities on decreased blood pressure in patients with hypertension.docx by Thiago Rozales Ramis (5311217)

Quantification and accuracy of average VAF. by Lizhi Yu (12476136)

Subjects:

Analytical sensitivity and reproducibility. by Lizhi Yu (12476136)

Subjects:

Depth of coverage and heterogeneity of the mutation loci. x-axis, mutation loci in sample set one or two; y-axis, depth of coverage after UMI consolidation. by Lizhi Yu (12476136)

Subjects:

Schematic overview of the cross-platform study. by Lizhi Yu (12476136)

Subjects:

Reference mutations versus background noise across replicates. by Lizhi Yu (12476136)

Subjects:

Coverage of reference gene panel by assay A to E for reference samples. by Lizhi Yu (12476136)

Subjects:

Impact of mutation type on VAF quantification performance. by Lizhi Yu (12476136)

Subjects:

Assay specifications from the vendors. by Lizhi Yu (12476136)

Subjects:

False positive rate. by Lizhi Yu (12476136)

Subjects: