Search alternatives:
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
2 step » _ step (Expand Search), a step (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
2 step » _ step (Expand Search), a step (Expand Search)
-
18181
Supplementary Material for: Urine Metabolomics by <sup>1</sup>H-NMR Spectroscopy Indicates Associations between Serum 3,5-T<sub>2</sub> Concentrations and Intermediary Metabolism i...
Published 2015“…In detail, the odds for intermediate or suppressed serum 3,5-T<sub>2</sub> concentrations doubled owing to a 1-standard deviation (SD) decrease in urine trigonelline levels, or increased by 29-50% in relation to a 1-SD decrease in urine pyroglutamate, acetone and hippurate levels. …”
-
18182
The effect of BMP-2 on type I collagen expression in HSFs.
Published 2015“…<p>The expression of type III collagen in HSFs after 3 days (A), 1 week (B) and 2 weeks (C). Lane 1-Untreated control, Lane 2–10 ng/ml BMP-2, Lane 3–50 ng/ml BMP-2, Lane 4–100 ng/ml BMP-2, Lane 5–10 ng/ml TGF-β1. …”
-
18183
-
18184
-
18185
Sequential broadside application of 100 µM FCCP at two separate regions in the same FDB fibre.
Published 2014“…Red vertical calibration bar in <b>A</b> represents 50 µm.</p>…”
-
18186
HG module schematic.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
18187
Label data volume and label distribution.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
18188
The structure of the context guided block.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
18189
SEnet module.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
18190
AC-LayeringNetV2 architecture module.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
18191
Cracks included in the dataset.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
18192
Loss function comparison plot.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
18193
Edge device performance benchmarking.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
18194
Typical error cases.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
18195
Computational efficiency comparison.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
18196
-
18197
Backbone comparison in crack detection.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
18198
Statistical analysis table for ablation tests.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
18199
Summary of false positives and false negatives.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”
-
18200
PR parameter comparison chart.
Published 2025“…Experimental results on a benchmark dataset demonstrate a 2.20% improvement in precision, a 3.50% increase in recall, and a 1.90% rise in mAP@50 compared to the baseline model. …”