Search alternatives:
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
mm decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
50 mm » 50 mg (Expand Search), 10 mm (Expand Search), 20 mm (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
mm decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
50 mm » 50 mg (Expand Search), 10 mm (Expand Search), 20 mm (Expand Search)
-
201
-
202
-
203
-
204
-
205
-
206
-
207
-
208
-
209
-
210
Summary of subgroup analysis results.
Published 2025“…Depending on the heterogeneity of the included studies, a fixed-effect model was applied for low heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> < 50%), whereas a random-effects model was employed when substantial heterogeneity was present (I<sup>2</sup> ≥ 50%). …”
-
211
Original study data.
Published 2025“…Depending on the heterogeneity of the included studies, a fixed-effect model was applied for low heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> < 50%), whereas a random-effects model was employed when substantial heterogeneity was present (I<sup>2</sup> ≥ 50%). …”
-
212
S2 File -
Published 2025“…Depending on the heterogeneity of the included studies, a fixed-effect model was applied for low heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> < 50%), whereas a random-effects model was employed when substantial heterogeneity was present (I<sup>2</sup> ≥ 50%). …”
-
213
-
214
-
215
-
216
-
217
Repetitive stress induces a decrease in sound-evoked activity.
Published 2025“…These mice exhibited a minimal change in noise-evoked PPy activity when comparing the first and second week of imaging (2-way ANOVA, F = 1.79, <i>p</i> = 0.11, post hoc baseline w1 50 dB: baseline w2 50 dB <i>p</i> = 1 Bonferroni corrected, nested ANOVA (mouse nested within session) F = 1.76, <i>p</i> = 0.12, mean ± SE). …”
-
218
-
219
-
220