Search alternatives:
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
10501
Intranasal NIC-hLYS is efficacious in vivo against MERS-CoV.
Published 2021“…<p>The efficacy of NIC-hLYS particles was assessed in a lethal MERS-CoV infection model (A). Once daily intranasal administration of NIC-hLYS particles suspended in 0.45% sodium chloride resulted in 43% survival in a lethal MERS-CoV infection (B) and produced a statistically significant decrease in lung viral titer at the highest dose tested (C). …”
-
10502
Intranasal NIC-hLYS is efficacious in vivo against MERS-CoV.
Published 2021“…<p>The efficacy of NIC-hLYS particles was assessed in a lethal SARS-CoV-2 infection model (A). Once daily intranasal administration of NIC-hLYS particles suspended in 0.45% sodium chloride resulted in 30% survival in a lethal SARS-CoV-2 infection (B) and produced a statistically significant decrease in lung viral titers after 10 days of dosing (C). …”
-
10503
-
10504
CsrA modulates the expression of a thiamine pyrophosphate (TPP) riboswitch element.
Published 2017“…<b>B</b>) EMSA with 200nM of biotinylated thi-element (TPP) RNA and purified CsrA: Lane 1: no CsrA, lane 2: 1.0 μM CsrA, lane 3: 2.0 μM CsrA, lane 4: 5.0 μM CsrA, lane 5: 5.0 μM CsrA + 2.0 μM unlabeled RsmZ. …”
-
10505
Histological abnormalities in E18.5 ATF2 mutant cerebellum and brainstem.
Published 2011“…Number of hypoglossal motoneurons (h) is bilaterally decreased in <i>Atf2<sup>−/−</sup></i> embryos while number of dorsal vagal motoneurons (v) appears normal. …”
-
10506
Characteristics of study subjects.
Published 2025“…Upon TID adjustment, the percentage of vegans meeting adequacy for protein and IAA decreased and only approximately 50% of the cohort could meet lysine and leucine requirements. …”
-
10507
Fig 4 -
Published 2023“…NETs in gastric tissues. Scale label 50 μm. NETs were observed in IgAV model group and decreased in DNase I intervention group but absent in control group. …”
-
10508
-
10509
-
10510
Effect of BPA on CYP450s expression, and nicotine modulation, in fetal rat brain
Published 2022“…Fetal brains were isolated at gestational days GD14 and GD19, and protein expression was assessed by Western blotting. Results showed a BPA-induced significant decrease in CYP1B1 expression levels at GD14 (p = 0.001), and CYP19A1 (aromatase) expression at both mid- and late-stage development (p < 0.001). …”
Get full text
Get full text
Get full text
-
10511
-
10512
De-identified dataset.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The median age of the 37 participants at enrollment was 70.5 years; 30 (81%) had prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, and 76% received Pfizer-BioNTech and 24% Moderna homologous vaccines. …”
-
10513
-
10514
EA treatment restored <i>Stat</i>5NKO-induced obese phenotype, improved energy metabolism and cold tolerance in the <i>Stat</i>5NKO obese mice.
Published 2017“…(E &F) EA treatment decreased <i>Stat</i>5NKO obese mice adipocyte size. …”
-
10515
Subgroup analysis.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>From September 25, 2021, to February 3, 2022, 153 patients were randomized. The mean decay rate in SARS-CoV-2 viral load log<sub>10</sub> within 10 days was -3.75 (95% CI, -4.11; -3.19) in the placebo group, -3.83 (95% CI, -4.40; -2.27) in the halofuginone 0.5mg group and -4.13 (95% CI, -4.69; -3.57) in the halofuginone 1mg group, with no statistically significant difference in between placebo vs. halofuginone 0.5mg (mean difference -0.08; 95% CI -0.82 to 0.66, p = 0.96) and between placebo vs. halofuginone 1mg (mean difference -0.38; 95% CI, -1.11; 0.36, p = 0.41). …”
-
10516
Study outcomes.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>From September 25, 2021, to February 3, 2022, 153 patients were randomized. The mean decay rate in SARS-CoV-2 viral load log<sub>10</sub> within 10 days was -3.75 (95% CI, -4.11; -3.19) in the placebo group, -3.83 (95% CI, -4.40; -2.27) in the halofuginone 0.5mg group and -4.13 (95% CI, -4.69; -3.57) in the halofuginone 1mg group, with no statistically significant difference in between placebo vs. halofuginone 0.5mg (mean difference -0.08; 95% CI -0.82 to 0.66, p = 0.96) and between placebo vs. halofuginone 1mg (mean difference -0.38; 95% CI, -1.11; 0.36, p = 0.41). …”
-
10517
-
10518
Adverse events <sup>a</sup>.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>From September 25, 2021, to February 3, 2022, 153 patients were randomized. The mean decay rate in SARS-CoV-2 viral load log<sub>10</sub> within 10 days was -3.75 (95% CI, -4.11; -3.19) in the placebo group, -3.83 (95% CI, -4.40; -2.27) in the halofuginone 0.5mg group and -4.13 (95% CI, -4.69; -3.57) in the halofuginone 1mg group, with no statistically significant difference in between placebo vs. halofuginone 0.5mg (mean difference -0.08; 95% CI -0.82 to 0.66, p = 0.96) and between placebo vs. halofuginone 1mg (mean difference -0.38; 95% CI, -1.11; 0.36, p = 0.41). …”
-
10519
Rhinorrhea-free days up to day 10.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>From September 25, 2021, to February 3, 2022, 153 patients were randomized. The mean decay rate in SARS-CoV-2 viral load log<sub>10</sub> within 10 days was -3.75 (95% CI, -4.11; -3.19) in the placebo group, -3.83 (95% CI, -4.40; -2.27) in the halofuginone 0.5mg group and -4.13 (95% CI, -4.69; -3.57) in the halofuginone 1mg group, with no statistically significant difference in between placebo vs. halofuginone 0.5mg (mean difference -0.08; 95% CI -0.82 to 0.66, p = 0.96) and between placebo vs. halofuginone 1mg (mean difference -0.38; 95% CI, -1.11; 0.36, p = 0.41). …”
-
10520
Vomit-free days up to day 10.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>From September 25, 2021, to February 3, 2022, 153 patients were randomized. The mean decay rate in SARS-CoV-2 viral load log<sub>10</sub> within 10 days was -3.75 (95% CI, -4.11; -3.19) in the placebo group, -3.83 (95% CI, -4.40; -2.27) in the halofuginone 0.5mg group and -4.13 (95% CI, -4.69; -3.57) in the halofuginone 1mg group, with no statistically significant difference in between placebo vs. halofuginone 0.5mg (mean difference -0.08; 95% CI -0.82 to 0.66, p = 0.96) and between placebo vs. halofuginone 1mg (mean difference -0.38; 95% CI, -1.11; 0.36, p = 0.41). …”