Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
-
1641
-
1642
Critical temperature <em>T<sub>c</sub></em> (in units of <em>t</em>) for different values of the interpolating parameter <em>a</em> at half-filling (from top to bottom, <em>a</em>...
Published 2013“…The reason for such a choice is that the π-flux cubic lattice displays Dirac points and that decreasing the hopping coefficient in a spatial direction (say, <em>t<sub>z</sub></em>), these Dirac points are unaltered: it is then possible to study the 3D–2D interpolation towards the π-flux square lattice. …”
-
1643
-
1644
-
1645
-
1646
-
1647
-
1648
-
1649
-
1650
-
1651
Aspirin decreases expression of NFκB and β-catenin in colon cancer cells.
Published 2013“…Levels of p65 and p50 proteins (relative to β-actin) in whole cell lysates were quantitated from 3 replicate experiments and were significantly decreased by aspirin. …”
-
1652
-
1653
-
1654
-
1655
-
1656
Decreased ISCs and increased goblet cells after intestinal specific loss of MLL1.
Published 2021“…(C) Decrease in ISC markers, OLFM4 and SOX9 in <i>Mll1</i><sup><i>FC/FC; Vil-Cre-ERT2/+</i></sup> intestinal sections. …”
-
1657
Prb1 overexpression decreased APCs in ESCRT-mutant cells after nitrogen starvation.
Published 2022“…Scale bar, 5 μm; arrows, APCs. <b>B.</b> Quantifications of cells containing soluble GFP in vacuoles. …”
-
1658
-
1659
DHT increases whereas orchidectomy decreases the weight and cross sectional area of hindlimb muscles.
Published 2013“…Likewise, orchidectomy did not cause a significant decrease in the muscle fiber number (7.0% decrease, 2681.0±86.9, <i>p</i> = 0.19) compared with control SOD1 mice (2883.7±97.0). …”
-
1660