Search alternatives:
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
ht decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
5 ht » 5 h (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
ht decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
5 ht » 5 h (Expand Search)
-
5641
-
5642
-
5643
-
5644
-
5645
-
5646
-
5647
-
5648
-
5649
-
5650
-
5651
-
5652
Sequence of <i>DpAP2</i> promoter.
Published 2024“…<i>parva</i> cells treated with different concentrations of MeJA (10, 20, 50, 100 μM) and GA3 (10, 20, 50, 100 μM). The high concentrations of MeJA (10–100 μM) inhibited the accumulation of carotenoid, and the relative expression of <i>DpAP2</i>, <i>PSY</i>, <i>PDS</i> and <i>GGPS</i> decreased significantly. …”
-
5653
Imbalanced Dataset Distribution.
Published 2025“…Every model was subjected to individual testing. The SMO_CNN model we developed demonstrated exceptional testing and training accuracies of 98.95% and 99.20% respectively, surpassing CNN, VGG19, and ResNet50 models. …”
-
5654
Data Preprocessing Steps for IDC Dataset.
Published 2025“…Every model was subjected to individual testing. The SMO_CNN model we developed demonstrated exceptional testing and training accuracies of 98.95% and 99.20% respectively, surpassing CNN, VGG19, and ResNet50 models. …”
-
5655
Flowchart of Proposed SMO_CNN.
Published 2025“…Every model was subjected to individual testing. The SMO_CNN model we developed demonstrated exceptional testing and training accuracies of 98.95% and 99.20% respectively, surpassing CNN, VGG19, and ResNet50 models. …”
-
5656
IDC Breast Cancer Dataset Descriptions.
Published 2025“…Every model was subjected to individual testing. The SMO_CNN model we developed demonstrated exceptional testing and training accuracies of 98.95% and 99.20% respectively, surpassing CNN, VGG19, and ResNet50 models. …”
-
5657
Accuracy Graph.
Published 2025“…Every model was subjected to individual testing. The SMO_CNN model we developed demonstrated exceptional testing and training accuracies of 98.95% and 99.20% respectively, surpassing CNN, VGG19, and ResNet50 models. …”
-
5658
Loss Graph.
Published 2025“…Every model was subjected to individual testing. The SMO_CNN model we developed demonstrated exceptional testing and training accuracies of 98.95% and 99.20% respectively, surpassing CNN, VGG19, and ResNet50 models. …”
-
5659
Hyperparameter Tuning of the Proposed Model.
Published 2025“…Every model was subjected to individual testing. The SMO_CNN model we developed demonstrated exceptional testing and training accuracies of 98.95% and 99.20% respectively, surpassing CNN, VGG19, and ResNet50 models. …”
-
5660
Comparison of Accuracy Metric.
Published 2025“…Every model was subjected to individual testing. The SMO_CNN model we developed demonstrated exceptional testing and training accuracies of 98.95% and 99.20% respectively, surpassing CNN, VGG19, and ResNet50 models. …”