Search alternatives:
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
5 step » _ step (Expand Search), a step (Expand Search), 2 step (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
5 step » _ step (Expand Search), a step (Expand Search), 2 step (Expand Search)
-
5921
Data Preprocessing Steps for IDC Dataset.
Published 2025“…Every model was subjected to individual testing. The SMO_CNN model we developed demonstrated exceptional testing and training accuracies of 98.95% and 99.20% respectively, surpassing CNN, VGG19, and ResNet50 models. …”
-
5922
Flowchart of Proposed SMO_CNN.
Published 2025“…Every model was subjected to individual testing. The SMO_CNN model we developed demonstrated exceptional testing and training accuracies of 98.95% and 99.20% respectively, surpassing CNN, VGG19, and ResNet50 models. …”
-
5923
IDC Breast Cancer Dataset Descriptions.
Published 2025“…Every model was subjected to individual testing. The SMO_CNN model we developed demonstrated exceptional testing and training accuracies of 98.95% and 99.20% respectively, surpassing CNN, VGG19, and ResNet50 models. …”
-
5924
Accuracy Graph.
Published 2025“…Every model was subjected to individual testing. The SMO_CNN model we developed demonstrated exceptional testing and training accuracies of 98.95% and 99.20% respectively, surpassing CNN, VGG19, and ResNet50 models. …”
-
5925
Loss Graph.
Published 2025“…Every model was subjected to individual testing. The SMO_CNN model we developed demonstrated exceptional testing and training accuracies of 98.95% and 99.20% respectively, surpassing CNN, VGG19, and ResNet50 models. …”
-
5926
Hyperparameter Tuning of the Proposed Model.
Published 2025“…Every model was subjected to individual testing. The SMO_CNN model we developed demonstrated exceptional testing and training accuracies of 98.95% and 99.20% respectively, surpassing CNN, VGG19, and ResNet50 models. …”
-
5927
Comparison of Accuracy Metric.
Published 2025“…Every model was subjected to individual testing. The SMO_CNN model we developed demonstrated exceptional testing and training accuracies of 98.95% and 99.20% respectively, surpassing CNN, VGG19, and ResNet50 models. …”
-
5928
ROC Curve for the Best Model (AUC = 0.92).
Published 2025“…Every model was subjected to individual testing. The SMO_CNN model we developed demonstrated exceptional testing and training accuracies of 98.95% and 99.20% respectively, surpassing CNN, VGG19, and ResNet50 models. …”
-
5929
Sampling Images of IDC Dataset.
Published 2025“…Every model was subjected to individual testing. The SMO_CNN model we developed demonstrated exceptional testing and training accuracies of 98.95% and 99.20% respectively, surpassing CNN, VGG19, and ResNet50 models. …”
-
5930
CNN Model Layers Summary.
Published 2025“…Every model was subjected to individual testing. The SMO_CNN model we developed demonstrated exceptional testing and training accuracies of 98.95% and 99.20% respectively, surpassing CNN, VGG19, and ResNet50 models. …”
-
5931
Training Data/Validation/Test.
Published 2025“…Every model was subjected to individual testing. The SMO_CNN model we developed demonstrated exceptional testing and training accuracies of 98.95% and 99.20% respectively, surpassing CNN, VGG19, and ResNet50 models. …”
-
5932
CNN Model Architecture.
Published 2025“…Every model was subjected to individual testing. The SMO_CNN model we developed demonstrated exceptional testing and training accuracies of 98.95% and 99.20% respectively, surpassing CNN, VGG19, and ResNet50 models. …”
-
5933
Impressive accuracy data.
Published 2025“…Every model was subjected to individual testing. The SMO_CNN model we developed demonstrated exceptional testing and training accuracies of 98.95% and 99.20% respectively, surpassing CNN, VGG19, and ResNet50 models. …”
-
5934
Performance Results of Proposed SMO_CNN Model.
Published 2025“…Every model was subjected to individual testing. The SMO_CNN model we developed demonstrated exceptional testing and training accuracies of 98.95% and 99.20% respectively, surpassing CNN, VGG19, and ResNet50 models. …”
-
5935
-
5936
Glycochenodexycholic (GCDCA) causes lumen obstruction and subepithelial fibrosis of neonatal extrahepatic bile ducts (EHBDs), while ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) attenuates GCDCA tox...
Published 2022“…Immunofluorescent staining for the cholangiocyte marker K19 (green) and the myofibroblast marker α-SMA (red) demonstrated an ameliorating effect of UDCA, with increased lumen integrity and decreased fibrosis. Scale bar, 50 μm. (b) Quantification of the total α-SMA positive area in the bile ducts (control 1 ± 0.255 (n = 20), GCDCA 4.19 ± 0.87 (n = 21), GCDCA +UDCA 1.87 ± 0.48 (n = 15)). …”
-
5937
Epidemic risk for the effective reproduction numbers (<i>R</i><sub><i>e</i></sub>) corresponding to reduced risk (1.1) and the minimum (1.4), median (2.8), and maximum (4.4) estima...
Published 2023“…Epidemic risk is the percent of 100,000 simulations, for each <i>R</i><sub><i>e</i></sub>, that become epidemics. We classified a simulation as an epidemic if it reached 2,000 cumulative infections and had a minimum prevalence of 50 new infections per day. …”
-
5938
-
5939
-
5940