Search alternatives:
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a step » _ step (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a step » _ step (Expand Search)
-
6421
-
6422
-
6423
-
6424
-
6425
-
6426
-
6427
-
6428
-
6429
-
6430
Sequence of <i>DpAP2</i> promoter.
Published 2024“…<i>parva</i> cells treated with different concentrations of MeJA (10, 20, 50, 100 μM) and GA3 (10, 20, 50, 100 μM). The high concentrations of MeJA (10–100 μM) inhibited the accumulation of carotenoid, and the relative expression of <i>DpAP2</i>, <i>PSY</i>, <i>PDS</i> and <i>GGPS</i> decreased significantly. …”
-
6431
Imbalanced Dataset Distribution.
Published 2025“…Every model was subjected to individual testing. The SMO_CNN model we developed demonstrated exceptional testing and training accuracies of 98.95% and 99.20% respectively, surpassing CNN, VGG19, and ResNet50 models. …”
-
6432
Flowchart of Proposed SMO_CNN.
Published 2025“…Every model was subjected to individual testing. The SMO_CNN model we developed demonstrated exceptional testing and training accuracies of 98.95% and 99.20% respectively, surpassing CNN, VGG19, and ResNet50 models. …”
-
6433
IDC Breast Cancer Dataset Descriptions.
Published 2025“…Every model was subjected to individual testing. The SMO_CNN model we developed demonstrated exceptional testing and training accuracies of 98.95% and 99.20% respectively, surpassing CNN, VGG19, and ResNet50 models. …”
-
6434
Accuracy Graph.
Published 2025“…Every model was subjected to individual testing. The SMO_CNN model we developed demonstrated exceptional testing and training accuracies of 98.95% and 99.20% respectively, surpassing CNN, VGG19, and ResNet50 models. …”
-
6435
Loss Graph.
Published 2025“…Every model was subjected to individual testing. The SMO_CNN model we developed demonstrated exceptional testing and training accuracies of 98.95% and 99.20% respectively, surpassing CNN, VGG19, and ResNet50 models. …”
-
6436
Hyperparameter Tuning of the Proposed Model.
Published 2025“…Every model was subjected to individual testing. The SMO_CNN model we developed demonstrated exceptional testing and training accuracies of 98.95% and 99.20% respectively, surpassing CNN, VGG19, and ResNet50 models. …”
-
6437
Comparison of Accuracy Metric.
Published 2025“…Every model was subjected to individual testing. The SMO_CNN model we developed demonstrated exceptional testing and training accuracies of 98.95% and 99.20% respectively, surpassing CNN, VGG19, and ResNet50 models. …”
-
6438
ROC Curve for the Best Model (AUC = 0.92).
Published 2025“…Every model was subjected to individual testing. The SMO_CNN model we developed demonstrated exceptional testing and training accuracies of 98.95% and 99.20% respectively, surpassing CNN, VGG19, and ResNet50 models. …”
-
6439
Sampling Images of IDC Dataset.
Published 2025“…Every model was subjected to individual testing. The SMO_CNN model we developed demonstrated exceptional testing and training accuracies of 98.95% and 99.20% respectively, surpassing CNN, VGG19, and ResNet50 models. …”
-
6440
CNN Model Layers Summary.
Published 2025“…Every model was subjected to individual testing. The SMO_CNN model we developed demonstrated exceptional testing and training accuracies of 98.95% and 99.20% respectively, surpassing CNN, VGG19, and ResNet50 models. …”