بدائل البحث:
point decrease » point increase (توسيع البحث)
mean decrease » a decrease (توسيع البحث)
we decrease » _ decrease (توسيع البحث), a decrease (توسيع البحث), teer decrease (توسيع البحث)
nn decrease » _ decrease (توسيع البحث), a decrease (توسيع البحث), gy decreased (توسيع البحث)
e point » _ point (توسيع البحث), 5 point (توسيع البحث), a point (توسيع البحث)
point decrease » point increase (توسيع البحث)
mean decrease » a decrease (توسيع البحث)
we decrease » _ decrease (توسيع البحث), a decrease (توسيع البحث), teer decrease (توسيع البحث)
nn decrease » _ decrease (توسيع البحث), a decrease (توسيع البحث), gy decreased (توسيع البحث)
e point » _ point (توسيع البحث), 5 point (توسيع البحث), a point (توسيع البحث)
-
561
-
562
-
563
-
564
-
565
-
566
-
567
-
568
-
569
-
570
Lowering Melting Points in Asymmetrically Substituted Salen-Copper(II) Complexes Exhibiting Mesomorphic Behavior. Structure of the Mesogen Cu(5-hexyloxySalen)
منشور في 2002"…In comparison with their symmetrical analogues, unsymmetrically substituted Cu−Salen complexes show mesophases with lowered melting points. For terminally substituted complexes, symmetrical ones (R<sup>1</sup> = R<sup>2</sup>) have only an S<sub>A</sub> phase, while for unsymmetrical alkoxy substitution a monotropic S<sub>E</sub> phase occurs and the melting temperature decreases with no loss in mesophase stability. …"
-
571
Lowering Melting Points in Asymmetrically Substituted Salen-Copper(II) Complexes Exhibiting Mesomorphic Behavior. Structure of the Mesogen Cu(5-hexyloxySalen)
منشور في 2002"…In comparison with their symmetrical analogues, unsymmetrically substituted Cu−Salen complexes show mesophases with lowered melting points. For terminally substituted complexes, symmetrical ones (R<sup>1</sup> = R<sup>2</sup>) have only an S<sub>A</sub> phase, while for unsymmetrical alkoxy substitution a monotropic S<sub>E</sub> phase occurs and the melting temperature decreases with no loss in mesophase stability. …"
-
572
S1 File -
منشور في 2024"…The CSPM, driven by the optimized CSPs, is then evaluated against two independent phenological datasets from Exp. 2 and Exp. 4 described in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0302098#pone.0302098.t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>. Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …"
-
573
Detailed information on field experiments.
منشور في 2024"…The CSPM, driven by the optimized CSPs, is then evaluated against two independent phenological datasets from Exp. 2 and Exp. 4 described in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0302098#pone.0302098.t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>. Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …"
-
574
List of symbols used in this study.
منشور في 2024"…The CSPM, driven by the optimized CSPs, is then evaluated against two independent phenological datasets from Exp. 2 and Exp. 4 described in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0302098#pone.0302098.t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>. Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …"
-
575
Data sources for calibration and evaluation.
منشور في 2024"…The CSPM, driven by the optimized CSPs, is then evaluated against two independent phenological datasets from Exp. 2 and Exp. 4 described in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0302098#pone.0302098.t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>. Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …"
-
576
-
577
-
578
-
579
-
580