Table_13_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.DOCX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”

Table_12_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.DOCX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”

Living 3,4-Polymerization of Isoprene by Cationic Rare Earth Metal Alkyl Complexes Bearing Iminoamido Ligands by Gaixia Du (1631482)

“…The sterically crowded complexes <b>1</b>−<b>3</b> give a mixture of 3,4- and <i>trans</i>-1,4-polyisoprenes (3,4-selectivities: 48−82%, <i>trans</i>-1,4-selectivities: 50−17%), whereas the less sterically demanding complexes <b>4</b>−<b>6</b> show high 3,4-selectivities (3,4-selectivities: 90−100%). …”

Table_14_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.XLSX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”

Table_3_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.XLSX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”

Table_11_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.DOCX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”

Table_15_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.XLSX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”

Loss of MLL1 in adult mice. by Neha Goveas (11790822)

“…<p>(A) Giemsa-stained sections from the femur of <i>Mll1</i>^{<i>FC/+; RC/+</i>} and <i>Mll1</i>^{<i>FC/FC; RC/+</i>} mice. …”

Table_5_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.DOCX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”

Data_Sheet_1_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.PDF by Huiling Zheng (49699)

“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”

Table_9_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.DOCX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”

Table_4_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.XLSX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”

Image 3_CS Ratio is an immune-related prognostic biomarker for cervical cancer.tiff by Peiqin Shi (22130170)

“…The CS polarization state reflects a highly coordinated network of pro-tumor anti-tumor variables offering a simplified yet effective immune response indicator for the complex TME. …”

Image 2_CS Ratio is an immune-related prognostic biomarker for cervical cancer.tiff by Peiqin Shi (22130170)

“…The CS polarization state reflects a highly coordinated network of pro-tumor anti-tumor variables offering a simplified yet effective immune response indicator for the complex TME. …”

Image 1_CS Ratio is an immune-related prognostic biomarker for cervical cancer.tiff by Peiqin Shi (22130170)

“…The CS polarization state reflects a highly coordinated network of pro-tumor anti-tumor variables offering a simplified yet effective immune response indicator for the complex TME. …”

Video_7_Additional Improvement of Respiratory Technique on Vascular Function in Hypertensive Postmenopausal Women Following Yoga or Stretching Video Classes: The YOGINI Study.MOV by Cláudia Fetter (9315074)

“…However, resting heart rate and PWV [baseline: Y+: 10.44 ± 3.69 and S+: 9.50 ± 0.53 m/s vs. post: Y+: 9.45 ± 0.39 (p = 0.003) and S+: 8.02 ± 0.47 m/s (p = 0.003)] decreased significantly only in the Y+ and S+ groups (baseline vs. post). …”

Synthesis of Bis-β-Diketonate Lanthanide Complexes with an Azobenzene Bridge and Studies of Their Reversible Photo/Thermal Isomerization Properties by Cai-Ye Fu (7360043)

“…The ligand, bis-β-diketone with an azobenzene bridge (4,4′-(4,4,4-trifluoro-1,3-butanedione)­azobenzene, <b>H</b>_<b>2</b><b>L</b>), was prepared for the synthesis of a series of dinuclear lanthanide complexes with the formula <b>[Ln</b>_<b>2</b><b>L</b>_<b>3</b><b>(DMSO)</b>_<b>4</b><b>]</b> (Ln = Eu³⁺, Gd³⁺, Tb³⁺, and DMSO = dimethyl sulfoxide). …”

Video_9_Additional Improvement of Respiratory Technique on Vascular Function in Hypertensive Postmenopausal Women Following Yoga or Stretching Video Classes: The YOGINI Study.MOV by Cláudia Fetter (9315074)

“…However, resting heart rate and PWV [baseline: Y+: 10.44 ± 3.69 and S+: 9.50 ± 0.53 m/s vs. post: Y+: 9.45 ± 0.39 (p = 0.003) and S+: 8.02 ± 0.47 m/s (p = 0.003)] decreased significantly only in the Y+ and S+ groups (baseline vs. post). …”

ChIP-SEQ detects position of <i>CEN5</i> Class B (distal) neocentromeres. by Carrie Ketel (266524)

“…The number of reads on <i>CEN2</i> is 50% higher than for other <i>CENs</i> in YJB8648, YJB9907 and YJB9929 because Chr2 is trisomic in these strains. …”

Synthesis of Bis-β-Diketonate Lanthanide Complexes with an Azobenzene Bridge and Studies of Their Reversible Photo/Thermal Isomerization Properties by Cai-Ye Fu (7360043)

“…The ligand, bis-β-diketone with an azobenzene bridge (4,4′-(4,4,4-trifluoro-1,3-butanedione)­azobenzene, <b>H</b>_<b>2</b><b>L</b>), was prepared for the synthesis of a series of dinuclear lanthanide complexes with the formula <b>[Ln</b>_<b>2</b><b>L</b>_<b>3</b><b>(DMSO)</b>_<b>4</b><b>]</b> (Ln = Eu³⁺, Gd³⁺, Tb³⁺, and DMSO = dimethyl sulfoxide). …”