Showing 11,621 - 11,640 results of 29,668 for search '(( 50 ((we decrease) OR (a decrease)) ) OR ( 5 ((step decrease) OR (nn decrease)) ))', query time: 0.89s Refine Results
  1. 11621
  2. 11622

    Table_1_The gut microbiota as a potential biomarker for methamphetamine use disorder: evidence from two independent datasets.docx by Linzi Liu (9386378)

    Published 2023
    “…Based on these microbial features, we developed a machine learning model to help identify MUD patients. …”
  3. 11623
  4. 11624
  5. 11625

    Image_3_Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Preoperative Embolization for Intracranial Giant Meningioma Tumorectomy: A Retrospective, Observational, Matched Cohort Study.tif by Yi Yin (448434)

    Published 2022
    “…</p>Results<p>Sixty-six cases in each group were included in our study after being matched. We did not find any significant differences of estimated blood loss (600.00 (400) vs. 500.00 (500.00) ml, p = 0.31), decrease of HGB level (30.81 ± 15.82 vs. 26.59 ± 12.90 g/L, p = 0.09), gross total resection rate (74.24% vs. 77.27%, p = 0.68), surgical time (302.50 (136) vs. 300.00 (72) min, p = 0.48), blood transfusion rates (53.03% vs. 42.42%, p = 0.35), blood transfusion volume [650.00 (657.50) vs. 535.00 (875.00) ml, p = 0.63] between the embolization group and nonembolization group. …”
  6. 11626

    Image_1_Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Preoperative Embolization for Intracranial Giant Meningioma Tumorectomy: A Retrospective, Observational, Matched Cohort Study.tif by Yi Yin (448434)

    Published 2022
    “…</p>Results<p>Sixty-six cases in each group were included in our study after being matched. We did not find any significant differences of estimated blood loss (600.00 (400) vs. 500.00 (500.00) ml, p = 0.31), decrease of HGB level (30.81 ± 15.82 vs. 26.59 ± 12.90 g/L, p = 0.09), gross total resection rate (74.24% vs. 77.27%, p = 0.68), surgical time (302.50 (136) vs. 300.00 (72) min, p = 0.48), blood transfusion rates (53.03% vs. 42.42%, p = 0.35), blood transfusion volume [650.00 (657.50) vs. 535.00 (875.00) ml, p = 0.63] between the embolization group and nonembolization group. …”
  7. 11627

    Image_2_Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Preoperative Embolization for Intracranial Giant Meningioma Tumorectomy: A Retrospective, Observational, Matched Cohort Study.tif by Yi Yin (448434)

    Published 2022
    “…</p>Results<p>Sixty-six cases in each group were included in our study after being matched. We did not find any significant differences of estimated blood loss (600.00 (400) vs. 500.00 (500.00) ml, p = 0.31), decrease of HGB level (30.81 ± 15.82 vs. 26.59 ± 12.90 g/L, p = 0.09), gross total resection rate (74.24% vs. 77.27%, p = 0.68), surgical time (302.50 (136) vs. 300.00 (72) min, p = 0.48), blood transfusion rates (53.03% vs. 42.42%, p = 0.35), blood transfusion volume [650.00 (657.50) vs. 535.00 (875.00) ml, p = 0.63] between the embolization group and nonembolization group. …”
  8. 11628

    Table_1_Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Preoperative Embolization for Intracranial Giant Meningioma Tumorectomy: A Retrospective, Observational, Matched Cohort Study.docx by Yi Yin (448434)

    Published 2022
    “…</p>Results<p>Sixty-six cases in each group were included in our study after being matched. We did not find any significant differences of estimated blood loss (600.00 (400) vs. 500.00 (500.00) ml, p = 0.31), decrease of HGB level (30.81 ± 15.82 vs. 26.59 ± 12.90 g/L, p = 0.09), gross total resection rate (74.24% vs. 77.27%, p = 0.68), surgical time (302.50 (136) vs. 300.00 (72) min, p = 0.48), blood transfusion rates (53.03% vs. 42.42%, p = 0.35), blood transfusion volume [650.00 (657.50) vs. 535.00 (875.00) ml, p = 0.63] between the embolization group and nonembolization group. …”
  9. 11629
  10. 11630
  11. 11631
  12. 11632
  13. 11633
  14. 11634
  15. 11635
  16. 11636
  17. 11637
  18. 11638

    Dynamics of soluble <i>Fgfr2b</i> expression and impact on AER maintenance after a single Dox-IP injection. by Soula Danopoulos (346564)

    Published 2013
    “…(<b>C</b>) Quantification of <i>soluble Fgfr2b</i> by qRT-PCR indicating a peak of expression at 6 hrs and a steep decrease at 24 hrs. …”
  19. 11639
  20. 11640