Search alternatives:
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
12621
-
12622
-
12623
-
12624
-
12625
-
12626
-
12627
-
12628
-
12629
-
12630
Increased CD4<sup>+</sup>CXCR5<sup>+</sup>T follicular helper cells in diabetic nephropathy
Published 2016“…Post-treatment, there was a significant reduction in the CD4<sup>+</sup>CXCR5<sup>+</sup>PD-1<sup>+</sup> Tfh cell counts and its subsets, with a corresponding decrease in plasma levels of IL-6 and IL-17A (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in DN patients, as compared to the HCs. …”
-
12631
Demonstration of NiV-induced lesion in the brain of AGM.
Published 2018“…<p>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed prior to and at multiple time points following NiV-exposure. (A) MRI scans from animal #8150 obtained at day 10 PI. …”
-
12632
-
12633
-
12634
Human AQP5 Plays a Role in the Progression of Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML)
Published 2008“…Moreover, by immunoblotting and flow cytometry, we show that phosphorylation of BCR-ABL1 is increased in AQP5-overexpressing CML cells and decreased in AQP5 siRNA-treated CML cells. …”
-
12635
Fiber cell ultrastructure near the bow region up to a depth of 300 μm.
Published 2016“…Note the nucleus is slightly irregular in shape but otherwise normal in appearance with portions of a nucleolus visible. Autophagosomes with double membranes are indicated (yellow arrows), although they decrease in number corresponding to a decrease in membranous organelles in the cytoplasm through this region. …”
-
12636
-
12637
-
12638
-
12639
-
12640
Table_1_v1_Role of Female Research at the Asociacion Mexicana de Cirugia General Annual Meeting: A Retrospective Analysis From 2013 to 2019.docx
Published 2022“…The percentage of females’ abstracts selected for oral presentation was less than the percentage of males’ 49 abstracts selected for presentation (9% vs. 11.5%; p = 0.002). Females’ abstracts submitted have a 50 23.5% decreased chance of being selected for oral presentation (OR = 0.765, CI 95%, 0.639–0.917, 51 p = 0.003). …”