Localization of key HH signaling proteins is impaired in <i>Ttbk2</i>^{<i>sca11/gt</i>} cilia. by Emily Bowie (543704)

Mean (±95% CI) of fold-change in monocular and binocular FMTs from smallest (7’) to largest (60’) target size obtained for mesopic and photopic conditions for central and parafovea... by C. Vijay Reena Durai (14498259)

Subjects:

Changes of fibrotic proteins in rat peritoneum. by Yangyang Yin (14323701)

Subjects:

Changes of miR-132-3p in peritoneal dialysis patients with different duration. by Yangyang Yin (14323701)

Subjects:

This is the raw data of IHC-1 in Rat. by Yangyang Yin (14323701)

Subjects:

Regulation of TGF-<i>β</i>1 protein expression by MiR-132-3p was verified using WB. by Yangyang Yin (14323701)

Subjects:

The effect of MiR-132-3p on protein expression in TGF-<i>β</i>1/Smad2/3 signaling pathway was observed by immunofluorescence. by Yangyang Yin (14323701)

Subjects:

Sequences of the primers for q-PCR. by Yangyang Yin (14323701)

Subjects:

Changes of peritoneal structure and function in rats. by Yangyang Yin (14323701)

Subjects:

Changes of miR-132-3p in rat peritoneum. by Yangyang Yin (14323701)

Subjects:

Mean changes in waist circumference from baseline to month 12 in the remission and non-remission groups. by Eun-Hee Nah (11751972)

Mean and standard error data of various variables followed in the current experiment under both drought and control environment. by Qasim Ali (802840)

Summary plot for the effect of important food sources of fructose-containing sugars on diastolic blood pressure (DBP). by Qi Liu (33068)

Summary plot for the effect of important food sources of fructose-containing sugars on systolic blood pressure (SBP). by Qi Liu (33068)

Mutations in inverted DNA repeats in P_<i>ganS</i> decrease GanR binding. by Cameron Habib (4112590)

Kinematic analyses including finite helical axes of drop jump landings demonstrate decreased knee control long after anterior cruciate ligament injury - Fig 4 by Helena Grip (7610468)

S1 File - by Yonghui Zhang (279832)

“…The CSPM, driven by the optimized CSPs, is then evaluated against two independent phenological datasets from Exp. 2 and Exp. 4 described in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0302098#pone.0302098.t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>. Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R²), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”

Detailed information on field experiments. by Yonghui Zhang (279832)

“…The CSPM, driven by the optimized CSPs, is then evaluated against two independent phenological datasets from Exp. 2 and Exp. 4 described in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0302098#pone.0302098.t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>. Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R²), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”

List of symbols used in this study. by Yonghui Zhang (279832)

“…The CSPM, driven by the optimized CSPs, is then evaluated against two independent phenological datasets from Exp. 2 and Exp. 4 described in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0302098#pone.0302098.t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>. Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R²), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”

Data sources for calibration and evaluation. by Yonghui Zhang (279832)

“…The CSPM, driven by the optimized CSPs, is then evaluated against two independent phenological datasets from Exp. 2 and Exp. 4 described in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0302098#pone.0302098.t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>. Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R²), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”