Search alternatives:
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
801
There is a significant decrease in fibroblast, α-SMA, and Ly6C staining accompanied with a decrease in proliferation, and increase in cell death in the outflow vein removed <i>Iex-...
Published 2014“…</b> Pooled data from the semiquantitative analysis for intensity of Fsp-1 staining in the vessel wall of the outflow vein specimens removed from <i>Iex-1</i> KO and WT mice. There is a significant decrease in the mean Fsp-1 staining in the <i>Iex-1</i> KO animals when compared to WT controls (P<0.05). …”
-
802
DataSheet2_Treatment of wild-type mice with 2,3-butanediol, a urinary biomarker of Fmo5−/− mice, decreases plasma cholesterol and epididymal fat deposition.pdf
Published 2022“…Our results indicate a microbial contribution to the phenotypic characteristic of Fmo5<sup>−/−</sup> mice of decreased plasma cholesterol and identify 2,3-butanediol as a potential agent for lowering plasma cholesterol.…”
-
803
DataSheet1_Treatment of wild-type mice with 2,3-butanediol, a urinary biomarker of Fmo5−/− mice, decreases plasma cholesterol and epididymal fat deposition.PDF
Published 2022“…Our results indicate a microbial contribution to the phenotypic characteristic of Fmo5<sup>−/−</sup> mice of decreased plasma cholesterol and identify 2,3-butanediol as a potential agent for lowering plasma cholesterol.…”
-
804
-
805
-
806
Relationships between empty body lipid weight decrease and corrected amounts of pollutants excreted through faeces (faecal output–feed input) for TCDD (○, ●), and PCBs 153 (□, ■) and 126 (Δ, ▲) over a 57-day depuration period in ewes receiving a control well-fed and non-supplemented treatments (CTL: ○, □, Δ; <i>n</i> = 4), or an underfed and mineral oil supplemented treatment (UFMO: ●, ■, ▲; <i>n</i> = 5).
Published 2020“…<p>Relationships between empty body lipid weight decrease and corrected amounts of pollutants excreted through faeces (faecal output–feed input) for TCDD (○, ●), and PCBs 153 (□, ■) and 126 (Δ, ▲) over a 57-day depuration period in ewes receiving a control well-fed and non-supplemented treatments (CTL: ○, □, Δ; <i>n</i> = 4), or an underfed and mineral oil supplemented treatment (UFMO: ●, ■, ▲; <i>n</i> = 5).…”
-
807
-
808
-
809
-
810
-
811
S1 File -
Published 2024“…Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”
-
812
-
813
Detailed information on field experiments.
Published 2024“…Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”
-
814
List of symbols used in this study.
Published 2024“…Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”
-
815
Data sources for calibration and evaluation.
Published 2024“…Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”
-
816
-
817
-
818
-
819
-
820