Search alternatives:
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
non decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
non decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
-
321
Stratified analyses.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>A total of 535 pregnant women were initially included in the study cohort and 478(89.35%) completed the follow-up, among 79 (16.5%) in the prolonged TTP group, and the rest in the short TTP group (n = 399, 83.5%). …”
-
322
DataSheet_1_Preclinical characterization of amubarvimab and romlusevimab, a pair of non-competing neutralizing monoclonal antibody cocktail, against SARS-CoV-2.pdf
Published 2022“…Here we describe two fully human mAbs, amubarvimab (BRII-196) and romlusevimab (BRII-198) that bind to non-competing epitopes on the receptor binding domain (RBD) of spike protein and effectively neutralize SARS-CoV-2 variants. …”
-
323
-
324
-
325
-
326
-
327
-
328
-
329
Patterns of lifetime use of substances by gender.
Published 2023“…The lifetime prevalence of substance use was 41.5%, while that of alcohol use was 36%. For both, a higher mean neuroticism score [substance use- (AOR 1.05, 95%CI; 1, 1.10: p = 0.013); alcohol use- (AOR 1.04, 95%CI; 0.99, 1.09: p = 0.032)] showed increased odds of lifetime use, while a higher mean agreeableness score [substance use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.008); alcohol use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.032)] showed decreased odds of lifetime use. …”
-
330
S1 Data -
Published 2023“…The lifetime prevalence of substance use was 41.5%, while that of alcohol use was 36%. For both, a higher mean neuroticism score [substance use- (AOR 1.05, 95%CI; 1, 1.10: p = 0.013); alcohol use- (AOR 1.04, 95%CI; 0.99, 1.09: p = 0.032)] showed increased odds of lifetime use, while a higher mean agreeableness score [substance use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.008); alcohol use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.032)] showed decreased odds of lifetime use. …”
-
331
Factors associated with substance use.
Published 2023“…The lifetime prevalence of substance use was 41.5%, while that of alcohol use was 36%. For both, a higher mean neuroticism score [substance use- (AOR 1.05, 95%CI; 1, 1.10: p = 0.013); alcohol use- (AOR 1.04, 95%CI; 0.99, 1.09: p = 0.032)] showed increased odds of lifetime use, while a higher mean agreeableness score [substance use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.008); alcohol use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.032)] showed decreased odds of lifetime use. …”
-
332
Factors associated with personality traits.
Published 2023“…The lifetime prevalence of substance use was 41.5%, while that of alcohol use was 36%. For both, a higher mean neuroticism score [substance use- (AOR 1.05, 95%CI; 1, 1.10: p = 0.013); alcohol use- (AOR 1.04, 95%CI; 0.99, 1.09: p = 0.032)] showed increased odds of lifetime use, while a higher mean agreeableness score [substance use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.008); alcohol use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.032)] showed decreased odds of lifetime use. …”
-
333
-
334
-
335
Net work vs phase of activation and lattice spacing. Top) We simulated work loops in the half sarcomere model at phases of activation of 0 to 0.95 in 0.05 increments, as well as over lattice spacings from 12 to 18 nm and plotted the new work for each condition. Bottom) We then simulated work loops over the same range, but with the stiffness of either the linear or torsional spring comprising the crossbridge head increased or decreased by 50% separately....
Published 2025“…Bottom) We then simulated work loops over the same range, but with the stiffness of either the linear or torsional spring comprising the crossbridge head increased or decreased by 50% separately. …”
-
336
-
337
-
338
T1 vs pelvis pressure.
Published 2023“…Each graph represents the treated kidney of each of the 5 animals. Cortex remote: visibly non-affected area; cortex 1–4: visibly affected areas; renal pelvis; medulla and dorsal muscle ROIs depicted by lines. …”
-
339
T1 vs accumulated pelvis pressure.
Published 2023“…Each graph represents the treated kidney of each of the 5 animals. Cortex remote: visibly non-affected area; cortex 1–4: visibly affected cortical areas; renal pelvis; medulla and dorsal muscle ROIs depicted by lines. …”
-
340