Search alternatives:
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
non decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
non decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
-
541
-
542
-
543
-
544
-
545
-
546
Sensitivity analysis.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>A total of 535 pregnant women were initially included in the study cohort and 478(89.35%) completed the follow-up, among 79 (16.5%) in the prolonged TTP group, and the rest in the short TTP group (n = 399, 83.5%). …”
-
547
Characteristics of participants.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>A total of 535 pregnant women were initially included in the study cohort and 478(89.35%) completed the follow-up, among 79 (16.5%) in the prolonged TTP group, and the rest in the short TTP group (n = 399, 83.5%). …”
-
548
Participant Flowchart.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>A total of 535 pregnant women were initially included in the study cohort and 478(89.35%) completed the follow-up, among 79 (16.5%) in the prolonged TTP group, and the rest in the short TTP group (n = 399, 83.5%). …”
-
549
Stratified analyses.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>A total of 535 pregnant women were initially included in the study cohort and 478(89.35%) completed the follow-up, among 79 (16.5%) in the prolonged TTP group, and the rest in the short TTP group (n = 399, 83.5%). …”
-
550
-
551
-
552
Time course of central retinal thickness (CRT) in recurrence and non-recurrence groups.
Published 2025“…In the non-recurrence group, CRT improved from 482.5 ± 112.8 to 294.7 ± 65.3, 302.0 ± 68.0, 284.7 ± 55.4, 285.3 ± 70.2, 265.2 ± 65.0, and 266.1 ± 78.2 μm at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively (Kruskal–Wallis test, P < 0.001; Dunn’s test, **P < 0.01). …”
-
553
-
554
-
555
S1 Data -
Published 2024“…The grand mean connectivity of the connectome equaled r = 0.41 (95% CI 0.31–0.50) for the test run and r = 0.40 (95% CI 0.29–0.49) for the retest run. …”
-
556
Connectivity statistics.
Published 2024“…The grand mean connectivity of the connectome equaled r = 0.41 (95% CI 0.31–0.50) for the test run and r = 0.40 (95% CI 0.29–0.49) for the retest run. …”
-
557
-
558
-
559
-
560