Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
-
701
-
702
-
703
-
704
Psychophysical performance of Exposed (square data points) and Unexposed (round data points) groups.
Published 2013“…<p>Prior to D-AP5 treatment, exposed animals were divided into two equal subgroups, one of which was randomly assigned to receive D-AP5 (open, square data points). …”
-
705
-
706
YorkU.forest.Oct5-2016
Published 2016“…Along this 50m transect line, we visually observed the number of woody plants located within 0.5m of the transect. …”
-
707
-
708
Data_Sheet_1_Impact of Climate Change on Hydrochemical Processes at Two High-Elevation Forested Watersheds in the Southern Appalachians, United States.pdf
Published 2022“…Climate change is predicted to have larger impact on soil processes at the lower elevation watershed and on vegetation processes at the higher elevation watershed. We also detect five change points of the first principal component of 17 key biogeochemical variables simulated with PnET-BGC between 1931 and 2100, with the last change point projected to occur 20 years earlier under RCP8.5 (2059 at WS18 and WS27) than under RCP4.5 (2079 at WS18 and 2074 at WS27) at both watersheds. …”
-
709
-
710
-
711
-
712
-
713
-
714
-
715
-
716
-
717
-
718
-
719
-
720
The combination of LPS and PFC caused faster clot initiation and decreased clot strength.
Published 2022“…Comparing groups, there is a significant decline in TEG MA in LPS-PFC3 group compared to LPS-SAL group at T72 and T96 time points (p<0.05). By RM ANOVA, the time effects were obscured by interaction with group: SAL-SAL, p = NS; LPS-SAL, MA increases with time; T0 v T72 and T96, p≤0.05; SAL-PFC: MA drops @ T96, p≤0.05; LPS-PFC: T0 v all others, p≤0.05 with a recovery at T96, (p≤0.05 compared to T72); SAL-PFC: no significant change, p = NS. …”