Search alternatives:
026 decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
2 we » _ we (Expand Search), 2 e (Expand Search), 2 w (Expand Search)
026 decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
2 we » _ we (Expand Search), 2 e (Expand Search), 2 w (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
Stability scores with refinement and no USM decreases.
Published 2022“…<p>Effects of guided and random substitutions within expert-designed proteins, when guided substitutions are not permitted to decrease USM EC<sub>50</sub> predictions.</p> <p>(EPS)</p>…”
-
7
-
8
Predicting pattern diversity decreases as a function of and .
Published 2025“…<p>For 50 Erdős-Rényi graphs with 30 nodes and 70 edges, we split the results into two columns according to the two initial degenerate unstable eigenmodes + : on the left, (if ), and on the right, (if ). …”
-
9
-
10
Scenario (6): Parameter variation (50% decrease)—With 5 N.m load applied at t = 0.3s.
Published 2023“…<p>Scenario (6): Parameter variation (50% decrease)—With 5 N.m load applied at t = 0.3s.…”
-
11
E<sub>50</sub> values.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
E<sub>50</sub> values of angle.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
-
17
Curve fitting of E<sub>50</sub>.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
-
18
Fitting curves of E<sub>50</sub>.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
-
19
E<sub>50</sub> values of size.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”
-
20
E<sub>50</sub> fluctuation coefficient.
Published 2024“…The research results indicate that: (1) As the rock bridge angle increases, the secant modulus gradually decreases, following a power function relationship. (2) As the rock size increases, the secant modulus shows a trend of first decreasing and then stabilizing, following a power function relationship. (3) As the rock bridge angle increases, the characteristic tangent modulus and characteristic size gradually decrease, following a power function relationship. …”