Search alternatives:
cs decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), c decreased (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
10 a » 10 _ (Expand Search), 10 μ (Expand Search), 19 a (Expand Search)
cs decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), c decreased (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
10 a » 10 _ (Expand Search), 10 μ (Expand Search), 19 a (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
Scatter plot for the absolute decrease in CS rates (A) and the relative decrease in CS rates (B) from 2008 to 2016 among hospitals in Guangzhou grouped by their baseline CS rates.
Published 2019“…The absolute decrease = the CS rate at baseline − the CS rate in Stage 2; the relative decrease = (the CS rate at baseline − the CS rate in Stage 2) ÷ the CS rate at baseline. …”
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
Does Mean Platelet Volume Decrease in the presence of Coronary Artery Fistula?
Published 2019“…Compared to the control group, median (IQR) High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) levels were significantly higher (p=0.04) and MPV levels were significantly lower in the CAF group (8.84 ± 1.71fL vs. 10.43 ± 1.34, p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, only MPV was a significant predictor of CAF (p < 0.001, 95% CI for OR: 0.438 (0.306-0.629). …”
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
mTORC1 hyperactivation led to a decreased autophagic activity in the podocytes.
Published 2020“…(<b>B</b>) <i>FIP200</i> and <i>ATG101</i> mRNA expressions were decreased in the primary cultured podocytes from <i>Tsc2</i><sup>Δ<i>podocyte</i></sup>. …”
-
19
FTY720 treatment decreased tumor growth in a xenograft model of hepatoblastoma.
Published 2019“…<p>(A) HuH6 cells (2.5 x 10<sup>6</sup> cells in 25% Matrigel) were injected subcutaneously into the right flank of 6-week-old female athymic nude mice. …”
-
20
Repetitive stress induces a decrease in sound-evoked activity.
Published 2025“…Activity rates decreased during repeated stress compared to baseline (2-way ANOVA, condition F = 185.6, <i>p</i> = 4.8 × 10<sup>−42</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 10.37, <i>p</i> = 9.3 × 10<sup>−21</sup>, nested ANOVA (mouse nested within session), condition F = 174, <i>p</i> = 1.5 × 10<sup>−39</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 12.7, <i>p</i> = 2 × 10<sup>−26</sup>, post hoc for each level baseline versus repetitive stress <i>p</i> < 0.01 for all levels above 50 dB, all Bonferroni corrected). …”