Search alternatives:
ms decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
1_ we » _ we (Expand Search)
ms decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
1_ we » _ we (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
SLE decreases risk for hormonal cancers.
Published 2021“…(b) Prostate cancer incidence in male SLE cohort is significantly decreased by SLE status (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.089, 0.50, p = 0.0053).…”
-
4
-
5
-
6
The fraction of predicted heterozygotes that are set to “No Call” by RHA decreases as the size of the heterozygote cluster increases.
Published 2022“…<p>For cluster sizes ranging from 1 to 4, we show the fraction of predicted heterozygotes with underlying unexpected intensities and the fraction of heterozygotes that are set to “No Call.” …”
-
7
-
8
-
9
DART-ID decreases missing datapoints across runs.
Published 2019“…Only peptides seen in >50% of experiments are included. (<b>b</b>) Decrease in missing data across all runs after applying DART-ID, for SCoPE-MS and the two bulk sets from <a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007082#pcbi.1007082.g004" target="_blank">Fig 4</a> at 1% FDR. …”
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
Decreased Incidence of Type 1 Diabetes in Young Finnish Children
Published 2020“…In the middle age group, a significant decrease was observed only among females. …”
-
20
Repetitive stress induces a decrease in sound-evoked activity.
Published 2025“…Activity rates decreased during repeated stress compared to baseline (2-way ANOVA, condition F = 185.6, <i>p</i> = 4.8 × 10<sup>−42</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 10.37, <i>p</i> = 9.3 × 10<sup>−21</sup>, nested ANOVA (mouse nested within session), condition F = 174, <i>p</i> = 1.5 × 10<sup>−39</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 12.7, <i>p</i> = 2 × 10<sup>−26</sup>, post hoc for each level baseline versus repetitive stress <i>p</i> < 0.01 for all levels above 50 dB, all Bonferroni corrected). …”