Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
c decrease » c decreased (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), rc decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
50 c » 50 _ (Expand Search), 50 μ (Expand Search), 5 c (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
c decrease » c decreased (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), rc decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
50 c » 50 _ (Expand Search), 50 μ (Expand Search), 5 c (Expand Search)
-
141
-
142
-
143
-
144
-
145
-
146
-
147
Rac1 activity rapidly decreases upon cell-cell adhesion in 3-D cell aggregates.
Published 2011“…High levels of active Rac1 at 0 minutes rapidly decreased (∼66%) within 5 minutes of cell-cell adhesion, and declined to a baseline level by 30 minutes (A). …”
-
148
-
149
Activation of mitoK<sub>ATP</sub> channels decreased the latency time of the transjunctional currents in slice.
Published 2013“…The holding potential for both cells was -80 mV. ‘‘a’’ indicates the onset time point of the voltage steps. …”
-
150
-
151
Response of small airway tissues infected with EV-D94 and decreasing doses of EV-D68.
Published 2022“…<p>Tissues were infected with 1E7 RNA copies of EV-D94 (equivalent to 2,46E4 TCID50) and 1E7 RNA copies of EV-D68 (3,3E5 TCID50) as well as decreasing doses of the latter. …”
-
152
-
153
-
154
-
155
Increases in 1,5-anhydrosorbitol and decreases in ascorbic acid following RYGB.
Published 2013“…B) For ascorbic acid, the ANOVA model did not detect group-specific changes over time (no group:time interaction), but indicated significant decreases from T0 to T6 in both groups. Overall, 1,5-anhydrosorbitol and ascorbic acid were significantly different at each time point between OB and OB/D subgroups (p<0.01, see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0007905#pone-0007905-t002" target="_blank"><b>TABLE 2</b></a>).…”
-
156
-
157
-
158
-
159
-
160