Search alternatives:
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
c decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), rc decreased (Expand Search)
50 c » 5 c (Expand Search), 20 c (Expand Search), 50 μ (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
c decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), rc decreased (Expand Search)
50 c » 5 c (Expand Search), 20 c (Expand Search), 50 μ (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
The introduction of mutualisms into assembled communities increases their connectance and complexity while decreasing their richness.
Published 2025“…(D) As a result, the introduction of mutualistic interactions promotes a growth in complexity in communities where it was once established as low, while stopping the introduction of further mutualistic interactions causes a slight decrease in complexity. The plots show the average values of 15 samples for every 50 assembly events (dots) and the vertical lines show the standard errors, calculated as the standard deviation divided by the square root of the number of samples. …”
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
Group-level narrow- and broad-band spectral changes after hemispherotomy reveal a marked EEG slowing of the isolated cortex, robust across patients.
Published 2025“…<b>(E)</b> Following surgery, the PSD became steeper in the disconnected cortex, as indexed by a significant pre- to post-decrease in Spectral Exponent toward more negative values, observed in all patients (i.e., all negative post-pre differences for the disconnected cortex). …”
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
(A) Auxiliary marking points to ensure complete and accurate seating of the prosthesis.
Published 2025Subjects: -
19
-
20
Repetitive stress induces a decrease in sound-evoked activity.
Published 2025“…Activity rates decreased during repeated stress compared to baseline (2-way ANOVA, condition F = 185.6, <i>p</i> = 4.8 × 10<sup>−42</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 10.37, <i>p</i> = 9.3 × 10<sup>−21</sup>, nested ANOVA (mouse nested within session), condition F = 174, <i>p</i> = 1.5 × 10<sup>−39</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 12.7, <i>p</i> = 2 × 10<sup>−26</sup>, post hoc for each level baseline versus repetitive stress <i>p</i> < 0.01 for all levels above 50 dB, all Bonferroni corrected). …”