Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
mm decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
50 mm » 10 mm (Expand Search), 50 mg (Expand Search), 20 mm (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
mm decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
50 mm » 10 mm (Expand Search), 50 mg (Expand Search), 20 mm (Expand Search)
-
21
-
22
Mean decrease in accuracy (MDA) of top 15 urine metabolites.
Published 2020“…Urine metabolites with a mean decrease in accuracy ≥ 0.004 in at least one post-treatment time point (2–5) were considered for inclusion in the predictive model.…”
-
23
-
24
-
25
-
26
-
27
-
28
In the absence of chloride, two-fold decrease in [Na<sup>+</sup>]<sub>e</sub> shifted GLT-1a E<sub>rev</sub> by −28 mV at both low and high glutamate concentrations.
Published 2015“…Arrows show amplitudes and directions of E<sub>rev</sub> shifts associated with decrease in [Na<sup>+</sup>]<sub>e</sub>. <b>(D)</b> Average E<sub>rev</sub> shifts at [Glu<sup>-</sup>]<sub>e</sub> geometric means of 37.5 and 600 μM are approximately equal when [Na<sup>+</sup>]<sub>e</sub> was decreased from 102 to 51 mM. …”
-
29
-
30
-
31
-
32
PowerPoint Slides for: Patiromer Decreases Serum Potassium and Phosphate Levels in Patients on Hemodialysis
Published 2016“…On patiromer, P decreased from 7.0 ± 0.5 to 6.2 ± 0.5 mg/dl (p = 0.04). …”
-
33
-
34
-
35
mGluR5 receptor decreased glycinergic currents.
Published 2019“…(<b>E</b>) The inhibitory effect of CHPG on GlyR-IPSCs was not blocked by intracellularly loaded GDP-β-S (62.3 ± 6.4% of baseline at 15–20 min post-CHPG, <i>t</i>[6] = 2.782, <i>p</i> = 0.032), chelerythrine (60.9 ± 11.3% of baseline at 15–20 min post-CHPG, <i>t</i>[6] = 2.705, <i>p</i> = 0.035), or Ro-32-0432 (69.9 ± 3.2% of baseline at 15–20 min post-CHPG, <i>t</i>[5] = 8.495, <i>p</i> < 0.001). (<b>F</b>) Postsynaptic loading of U-0126 or PD98059 prevented CHPG from decreasing glycinergic responses (U-0126, 107.6 ± 10.4% of baseline at 15–20 min post-CHPG, <i>t</i>[8] = 0.997, <i>p</i> = 0.348; PD98059, 93.1 ± 5.0% of baseline at 15–20 min post-CHPG, <i>t</i>[5] = 0.883, <i>p</i> = 0.418). …”
-
36
-
37
Density plots of normalised consumer final power (PC) for the six example networks, shown over decreasing ratios of mean consumer to mean resource potential, .
Published 2020“…<p>Each plot shows the density for the normalised consumer final power at = 0.75, 0.5, and 0.25, from left to right, as the ratio decreases due to increased resource flow during the simulation. …”
-
38
-
39
-
40