Showing 1 - 20 results of 173,573 for search '(( 50 ms decrease ) OR ((( 10 ((_ decrease) OR (a decrease)) ) OR ( 5 point decrease ))))', query time: 0.88s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3

    SLE decreases risk for hormonal cancers. by Deborah K. Johnson (10001156)

    Published 2021
    “…<p>Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals of SLE and MS cohorts. For all graphs, the dotted line represents an OR of 1.0. …”
  4. 4

    Downregulation of DOM decreases the abundance of PER and TIM. by Zhenxing Liu (399809)

    Published 2019
    “…Downregulation of DOM decreased PER levels at CT1-5 and CT17-21. (Scale bar: 50 um.) …”
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9

    DART-ID decreases missing datapoints across runs. by Albert Tian Chen (6900215)

    Published 2019
    “…Only peptides seen in >50% of experiments are included. (<b>b</b>) Decrease in missing data across all runs after applying DART-ID, for SCoPE-MS and the two bulk sets from <a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007082#pcbi.1007082.g004" target="_blank">Fig 4</a> at 1% FDR. …”
  10. 10

    mGluR5 receptor decreased glycinergic currents. by Zi-Yang Zhang (4988555)

    Published 2019
    “…(<b>E</b>) The inhibitory effect of CHPG on GlyR-IPSCs was not blocked by intracellularly loaded GDP-β-S (62.3 ± 6.4% of baseline at 15–20 min post-CHPG, <i>t</i>[6] = 2.782, <i>p</i> = 0.032), chelerythrine (60.9 ± 11.3% of baseline at 15–20 min post-CHPG, <i>t</i>[6] = 2.705, <i>p</i> = 0.035), or Ro-32-0432 (69.9 ± 3.2% of baseline at 15–20 min post-CHPG, <i>t</i>[5] = 8.495, <i>p</i> < 0.001). (<b>F</b>) Postsynaptic loading of U-0126 or PD98059 prevented CHPG from decreasing glycinergic responses (U-0126, 107.6 ± 10.4% of baseline at 15–20 min post-CHPG, <i>t</i>[8] = 0.997, <i>p</i> = 0.348; PD98059, 93.1 ± 5.0% of baseline at 15–20 min post-CHPG, <i>t</i>[5] = 0.883, <i>p</i> = 0.418). …”
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19

    Data_Sheet_1_The Risky Decrease of Fishing Reference Points Under Climate Change.docx by Morgane Travers-Trolet (548023)

    Published 2020
    “…The model was first parameterized and run to fit the historical situation (2000–2009) and then used to assess the ecosystem state for the 2050–2059 period, using two contrasting climate change scenarios (RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5). For each condition, a monospecific MSY estimation routine was performed by varying species fishing mortality independently and allowed estimation of reference points for each species. …”
  20. 20