Search alternatives:
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search)
ms decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
50 ms » 500 ms (Expand Search), 50 mg (Expand Search), 50 mm (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search)
ms decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
50 ms » 500 ms (Expand Search), 50 mg (Expand Search), 50 mm (Expand Search)
-
81
-
82
-
83
-
84
-
85
-
86
-
87
-
88
-
89
-
90
Annual treatment frequencies in recurrence and non-recurrence groups.
Published 2025“…Mean outpatient visits in the recurrence group decreased from 13.6 ± 3.0 to 11.9 ± 5.0, 8.1 ± 3.9, and 7.8 ± 3.2 at 1, 2, and 3 years postoperatively, respectively (Kruskal-Wallis test, p < 0.001). …”
-
91
-
92
rVλ6Wil fibrils cause a decrease in cardiomyocytes MTT reduction without inducing cell death.
Published 2015“…(C) Cell number, quantified using crystal violet (black) did not decrease over 72 h of incubation with 1 μM rVλ6Wil fibrils despite a decrease in MMT reduction (grey; n = 3 samples per time point). …”
-
93
-
94
-
95
-
96
-
97
Annual number of outpatient visits in recurrence and non-recurrence groups.
Published 2025“…<p>In the recurrence group, mean outpatient visits (± standard deviation) decreased from 13.6 ± 3.0 to 11.9 ± 5.0, 8.1 ± 3.9, and 7.8 ± 3.2 at 1, 2, and 3 years postoperatively, respectively (Kruskal-Wallis test, P < 0.001; Dunn’s test, **P < 0.01). …”
-
98
A summary of the included study characteristics.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
99
-
100