Showing 261 - 280 results of 26,672 for search '(( 50 ms decrease ) OR ( 50 ((((ng decrease) OR (a decrease))) OR (nn decrease)) ))', query time: 0.88s Refine Results
  1. 261

    eNOS phosphorylation increased intracellular ROS generation and decreased cell viability in BH4-depleted cells. by Hu Peng (396074)

    Published 2015
    “…HEK293 eNOS control, *, <i>p</i> < 0.01). 50ng/mL VEGF caused further decrease of cell viability in eNOS overexpressing HEK293 cells treated with 10mM DAHP (VEGF plus DAHP vs. …”
  2. 262
  3. 263
  4. 264
  5. 265

    The TLR4 activator LPS decreases photoreceptor viability and reducesWnt-mediated protection from oxidative stress. by Hyun Yi (57741)

    Published 2012
    “…<p>(A) Muller glia-photoreceptor cultures were incubated for 24 hr in 0.4 mM H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> to induce oxidative stress, with and without recombinant Wnt3a (150 ng/ml) or the TLR4 activator LPS (5 and 50 µg/ml). …”
  6. 266
  7. 267
  8. 268
  9. 269

    Estimated time (in days) required for a decrease of the viral titer by 1 log<sub>10</sub> TCID<sub>50</sub>/mL. by Camille Lebarbenchon (122050)

    Published 2011
    “…<p>Estimated time (in days) required for a decrease of the viral titer by 1 log<sub>10</sub> TCID<sub>50</sub>/mL.…”
  10. 270

    OP50 <i>E. coli</i>-fed nematodes are generally healthy while pathogen-fed worms demonstrate a decrease in overall health. by Michelle R. Bond (669241)

    Published 2014
    “…(B) The average pumping rate for nematodes fed <i>P. aeruginosa</i> is decreased when compared to N2 animals fed OP50. Worms with a <i>pmk-1(km25)</i> background exhibit the largest decrease in pumping rate. …”
  11. 271
  12. 272

    The schematic diagram of the SD decrease and CNR increase rates by 50% ASiR and MBIR (compared with those by FBP). by Peigang Ning (541890)

    Published 2014
    “…<p>As the mA value decreased, MBIR brought about gradually augmented variations in the two parameters, whereas 50% ASiR did not give rise to noticeable variations.…”
  13. 273

    Species that significantly increased (“Winners”) or decreased (“Losers”) in abundance over the past 50+ years in the study area [33]. by Katie Frerker (680803)

    Published 2014
    “…</p><p>Species that significantly increased (“Winners”) or decreased (“Losers”) in abundance over the past 50+ years in the study area <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0115843#pone.0115843-Wiegmann1" target="_blank">[33]</a>.…”
  14. 274
  15. 275
  16. 276
  17. 277
  18. 278
  19. 279
  20. 280