Mean (±95% CI) of fold-change in monocular and binocular FMTs from smallest (7’) to largest (60’) target size obtained for mesopic and photopic conditions for central and parafovea... by C. Vijay Reena Durai (14498259)

Subjects:

Stimulation results changing the shape of the stimulus pulse with rhythmic stimulation. by Felipe A. Torres (11210983)

SO down-peak locked results with different stimulation type. by Felipe A. Torres (11210983)

External stimuli on the eirs-NFT model. by Felipe A. Torres (11210983)

Flow diagram of this study. by Jae-Chan Ryu (2850581)

“…The risk of in-stent restenosis of more than 50% was significantly decreased when TC/HDL-C ratio (odds ratio [OR] 0.22, [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05–0.87]) and LDL-C/HDL-C ratio (OR 0.23, [95% CI 0.06–0.93]) decreased or when HDL-C levels (OR 0.10, [95% CI 0.02–0.63]) were increased at 12 months compared with baseline measurements.…”

K562 cells treated with 25, 50, and 75 μM of hemin for 48 h. by Tipparat Penglong (164413)

ROS and superoxide decrease in the dormant form of mycobacteria. by Amar Yeware (7115063)

Diabetic kidney shows decreased klotho expression. by Jeong Suk Kang (7359572)

“…<p>(a) Representative images of the kidney from normal and diabetic biopsies showing the decreased klotho expression in diabetic podocytes by IHC. …”

Predicting pattern diversity decreases as a function of and . by Selim Haj Ali (21222613)

“…<p>For 50 Erdős-Rényi graphs with 30 nodes and 70 edges, we split the results into two columns according to the two initial degenerate unstable eigenmodes  +  : on the left, (if ), and on the right, (if ). …”

Means and standard deviations of the age of mothers, fathers, and children across the seven waves. by Chiara Remondi (15301459)

Critical Role of Voltage Application Points in “Analog” and “Digital” Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry by Min-Min Hung (21096009)

Mean values (± standard deviation) of liver profile parameters before and after CWI. by Aneta Teległów (9570190)

Interaction strength in plant-pollinator networks: Are we using the right measure? by Roberto Novella-Fernandez (8119745)

Relationship between pattern electroretinogram and optic disc morphology in glaucoma by Soo Ji Jeon (3364214)

“…However, in glaucoma patients, mean RNFL thickness was associated with PERG amplitude (<i>P =</i> 0.011 for P50 and 0.002 for N95).…”

Mean scores and 95% CIs according to SARS-CoV-2 infection status and work-related determinants. by A. H. Ayesha Lavell (16734002)

Effect of melatonin (50 μM) on the TGF-β1 (10 ng/mL, 72 h)-mediated TGF-β1/Smad pathway and EMT in HBdSMCs. by Yang Zhang (30734)

S1 File - by Yonghui Zhang (279832)

“…The CSPM, driven by the optimized CSPs, is then evaluated against two independent phenological datasets from Exp. 2 and Exp. 4 described in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0302098#pone.0302098.t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>. Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R²), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”

Detailed information on field experiments. by Yonghui Zhang (279832)

“…The CSPM, driven by the optimized CSPs, is then evaluated against two independent phenological datasets from Exp. 2 and Exp. 4 described in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0302098#pone.0302098.t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>. Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R²), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”

List of symbols used in this study. by Yonghui Zhang (279832)

“…The CSPM, driven by the optimized CSPs, is then evaluated against two independent phenological datasets from Exp. 2 and Exp. 4 described in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0302098#pone.0302098.t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>. Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R²), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”

Data sources for calibration and evaluation. by Yonghui Zhang (279832)

“…The CSPM, driven by the optimized CSPs, is then evaluated against two independent phenological datasets from Exp. 2 and Exp. 4 described in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0302098#pone.0302098.t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>. Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R²), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”