Image_2_Reciprocal Relationship Between HDAC2 and P-Glycoprotein/MRP-1 and Their Role in Steroid Resistance in Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome.tif by Harshit Singh (6724346)

“…Compared to baseline, TSA treatment increased mRNA levels of P-gp and MRP-1 (fold change 7.51, 7.31, ^*p < 0.0001 in SRNS) and (fold change 3.49, 3.35, ^*p < 0.0001 in SSNS), respectively. It significantly decreased the level of HDAC2 (fold change 1.50, ^*p < 0.0001 in SRNS) (fold change 2.53, ^*p < 0.0001 in SSNS) patients.…”

Image_4_Reciprocal Relationship Between HDAC2 and P-Glycoprotein/MRP-1 and Their Role in Steroid Resistance in Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome.tif by Harshit Singh (6724346)

“…Compared to baseline, TSA treatment increased mRNA levels of P-gp and MRP-1 (fold change 7.51, 7.31, ^*p < 0.0001 in SRNS) and (fold change 3.49, 3.35, ^*p < 0.0001 in SSNS), respectively. It significantly decreased the level of HDAC2 (fold change 1.50, ^*p < 0.0001 in SRNS) (fold change 2.53, ^*p < 0.0001 in SSNS) patients.…”

Image_3_Reciprocal Relationship Between HDAC2 and P-Glycoprotein/MRP-1 and Their Role in Steroid Resistance in Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome.tif by Harshit Singh (6724346)

“…Compared to baseline, TSA treatment increased mRNA levels of P-gp and MRP-1 (fold change 7.51, 7.31, ^*p < 0.0001 in SRNS) and (fold change 3.49, 3.35, ^*p < 0.0001 in SSNS), respectively. It significantly decreased the level of HDAC2 (fold change 1.50, ^*p < 0.0001 in SRNS) (fold change 2.53, ^*p < 0.0001 in SSNS) patients.…”

Image_1_Reciprocal Relationship Between HDAC2 and P-Glycoprotein/MRP-1 and Their Role in Steroid Resistance in Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome.tif by Harshit Singh (6724346)

“…Compared to baseline, TSA treatment increased mRNA levels of P-gp and MRP-1 (fold change 7.51, 7.31, ^*p < 0.0001 in SRNS) and (fold change 3.49, 3.35, ^*p < 0.0001 in SSNS), respectively. It significantly decreased the level of HDAC2 (fold change 1.50, ^*p < 0.0001 in SRNS) (fold change 2.53, ^*p < 0.0001 in SSNS) patients.…”

Targeting pan-caspase activation suppresses HIV-1 infection. by Jason Segura (14608801)

“…Primary CD8-depleted PBMC were infected with HIV-1_BAL for 6 days in the presence of 50uM indicated caspase inhibitors and analyzed for the accumulation of p24+/CD62L- populations (<b>A</b>) as well as the level of infection using intracellular p24 staining (<b>B</b>). …”

Image_1_T-Lymphocyte Subsets Alteration, Infection and Renal Outcome in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease.TIF by Jiachuan Xiong (748476)

“…The primary outcomes were the major infection and renal outcome.</p><p>Results: A total of 410 CKD patients were enrolled; the average age was 47.25 years. …”

Data_Sheet_1_T-Lymphocyte Subsets Alteration, Infection and Renal Outcome in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease.docx by Jiachuan Xiong (748476)

“…The primary outcomes were the major infection and renal outcome.</p><p>Results: A total of 410 CKD patients were enrolled; the average age was 47.25 years. …”

Image_2_T-Lymphocyte Subsets Alteration, Infection and Renal Outcome in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease.TIFF by Jiachuan Xiong (748476)

“…The primary outcomes were the major infection and renal outcome.</p><p>Results: A total of 410 CKD patients were enrolled; the average age was 47.25 years. …”

Table_8_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.XLSX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”

Table_1_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.DOCX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”

Table_6_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.DOCX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”

Table_10_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.DOCX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”

Table_2_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.XLSX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”

Table_7_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.DOCX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”

Table_13_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.DOCX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”

Table_12_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.DOCX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”

Table_14_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.XLSX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”

Table_3_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.XLSX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”

Table_11_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.DOCX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”

Table_15_Meta-analysis of hybrid immunity to mitigate the risk of Omicron variant reinfection.XLSX by Huiling Zheng (49699)

“…The effectiveness of hybrid immunity (incomplete vaccination) in mitigating the risk of reinfection was 37.88% (95% CI, 28.88–46.89%) within 270–364 days, and decreased to 33.23%% (95% CI, 23.80–42.66%) within 365–639 days; whereas, the effectiveness after complete vaccination was 54.36% (95% CI, 50.82–57.90%) within 270–364 days, and the effectiveness of booster vaccination was 73.49% (95% CI, 68.95–78.04%) within 90–119 days.…”