Search alternatives:
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
5 step » _ step (Expand Search), a step (Expand Search), 2 step (Expand Search)
50 nn » 50 ns (Expand Search), 50 ng (Expand Search), 50 n (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
5 step » _ step (Expand Search), a step (Expand Search), 2 step (Expand Search)
50 nn » 50 ns (Expand Search), 50 ng (Expand Search), 50 n (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
Spatial representation of mean annual soil loss increase/decrease derived with the different modeling centers (rows) and time steps (columns) with the SSP5-8.5.
Published 2023“…<p>Spatial representation of mean annual soil loss increase/decrease derived with the different modeling centers (rows) and time steps (columns) with the SSP5-8.5.…”
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
Table of step height.
Published 2024“…Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
-
16
The well wall step.
Published 2024“…Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20
Seven out of the 11 human cytidine deaminases are more highly expressed in tumor versus normal tissue and their higher expression is correlated with a decrease in survival.
Published 2024“…<p>(A) Higher expression of 8 out of the 11 human cytidine deaminases correlates with decreased survival probability. Survival data was obtained from Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) unmatched normal samples and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) matched normal and tumor samples using the Xena platform [<a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002718#pbio.3002718.ref051" target="_blank">51</a>]. …”