Search alternatives:
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
ng decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
50 nn » 50 ns (Expand Search), 50 ng (Expand Search), 50 n (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
ng decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
50 nn » 50 ns (Expand Search), 50 ng (Expand Search), 50 n (Expand Search)
-
121
-
122
-
123
-
124
-
125
-
126
-
127
-
128
-
129
-
130
SUVmax and SUVmean for each hot sphere when the Gaussian filter is changed.
Published 2025Subjects: -
131
-
132
-
133
-
134
-
135
A summary of calibration standards (n = 3).
Published 2025“…The method was considered precise (with the following relative standard deviation values: 6.0–6.9% for SIM, and 8.1–12.9% for SIMA) and accurate (with the following mean accuracies: 91.4–100.1% for SIM, and 102.2–115.4% for SIMA). …”
-
136
The observed MRM reactions.
Published 2025“…The method was considered precise (with the following relative standard deviation values: 6.0–6.9% for SIM, and 8.1–12.9% for SIMA) and accurate (with the following mean accuracies: 91.4–100.1% for SIM, and 102.2–115.4% for SIMA). …”
-
137
Intra- and inter-day precision and accuracy.
Published 2025“…The method was considered precise (with the following relative standard deviation values: 6.0–6.9% for SIM, and 8.1–12.9% for SIMA) and accurate (with the following mean accuracies: 91.4–100.1% for SIM, and 102.2–115.4% for SIMA). …”
-
138
-
139
-
140