Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
-
101
-
102
Estimated mean values for light interception.
Published 2024“…However, with increasing PD, the proportion of higher-concentrated inflorescence fractions from upper canopy layers increased from 46% to 68%, while an extension of DVP shifted this proportion only marginally from 45% to 50%. In the context of standardized production, we therefore advocate high-density production systems that increase the proportion of desired inflorescence fractions from upper canopy layers.…”
-
103
-
104
-
105
-
106
-
107
-
108
-
109
-
110
-
111
-
112
-
113
-
114
-
115
Prb1 overexpression decreased APCs in ESCRT-mutant cells after nitrogen starvation.
Published 2022“…Scale bar, 5 μm; arrows, APCs. <b>B.</b> Quantifications of cells containing soluble GFP in vacuoles. …”
-
116
Datasheet1_Impact of lockdown on children with type-1 diabetes: returning to the community was associated with a decrease in HbA1c.pdf
Published 2023“…No significant difference was observed between medians of HbA1c_mean and HbA1c_after values (8.37% [7.88; 9.32%] vs. 8.50% [7.70; 9.50%], respectively; p = 0.391). Returning to the community was a protective factor [OR 0.31 (0.09–0.94); p = 0.045]. …”
-
117
Datasheet2_Impact of lockdown on children with type-1 diabetes: returning to the community was associated with a decrease in HbA1c.pdf
Published 2023“…No significant difference was observed between medians of HbA1c_mean and HbA1c_after values (8.37% [7.88; 9.32%] vs. 8.50% [7.70; 9.50%], respectively; p = 0.391). Returning to the community was a protective factor [OR 0.31 (0.09–0.94); p = 0.045]. …”
-
118
-
119
-
120