Search alternatives:
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
Change in Mean Anxiety Scores Over time by group.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Trial registration</p><p>Clinical<u>Trials.gov</u> <a href="https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02707237" target="_blank">NCT02707237</a></p></div>…”
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
A summary of calibration standards (n = 3).
Published 2025“…The method was considered precise (with the following relative standard deviation values: 6.0–6.9% for SIM, and 8.1–12.9% for SIMA) and accurate (with the following mean accuracies: 91.4–100.1% for SIM, and 102.2–115.4% for SIMA). …”
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20
Test joint.
Published 2024“…Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”