Table_2_Reciprocal Relationship Between HDAC2 and P-Glycoprotein/MRP-1 and Their Role in Steroid Resistance in Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome.DOCX by Harshit Singh (6724346)

“…Compared to baseline, TSA treatment increased mRNA levels of P-gp and MRP-1 (fold change 7.51, 7.31, ^*p < 0.0001 in SRNS) and (fold change 3.49, 3.35, ^*p < 0.0001 in SSNS), respectively. It significantly decreased the level of HDAC2 (fold change 1.50, ^*p < 0.0001 in SRNS) (fold change 2.53, ^*p < 0.0001 in SSNS) patients.…”

Table_1_Reciprocal Relationship Between HDAC2 and P-Glycoprotein/MRP-1 and Their Role in Steroid Resistance in Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome.DOCX by Harshit Singh (6724346)

“…Compared to baseline, TSA treatment increased mRNA levels of P-gp and MRP-1 (fold change 7.51, 7.31, ^*p < 0.0001 in SRNS) and (fold change 3.49, 3.35, ^*p < 0.0001 in SSNS), respectively. It significantly decreased the level of HDAC2 (fold change 1.50, ^*p < 0.0001 in SRNS) (fold change 2.53, ^*p < 0.0001 in SSNS) patients.…”

Repetitive stress modulates loudness perception. by Ghattas Bisharat (20706928)

“…We define the perceptual boundary as the intensity where the psychometric fit to the choice function, crosses PLoud = 0.5. Mice exhibited increased perceptual boundaries during repeated stress, indicating a decreased loudness perception (<i>t</i> test, <i>p</i> = 1.2 × 10⁻⁰⁵, mean ± SE). …”

DataSheet_1_Synergistic effect of endurance training and nettle leaf extract on the IDO1-KYN-AHR pathway homeostasis and inhibiting of liver toxicity in rats with STZ-induced diabe... by Rouhollah Haghshenas (15923246)

“…However, the D + EndTr + NLE group showed a more significant decrease in these factors (P< 0.05). …”

Table_1_The Metabolic Changes and Immune Profiles in Patients With COVID-19.pdf by Bing He (135034)

“…Of the leukocytes, 47% (IQR, 33–59) were lymphocytes [2.5 × 10⁹/L (IQR, 2.2–3.3)], and monocytes were 0.51 × 10⁹/L (IQR, 0.45–0.57) in young children with COVID-19. …”

Impact of local reference laboratory and external quality assurance measures on BUD control. by Marcus Beissner (139059)

“…Analysis for linear trends in proportions revealed a significant (<i>p</i><0.01) increase of patients presenting with non-ulcerative lesions from 37.0% (2007–2010) to 50.0% (2011–2012). The mean duration of disease among patients with non-ulcerative lesions before presentation and establishment of clinical diagnosis decreased not significantly from 51.8 (95% CI: 19.0–84.7) to 35.0 (95% CI: 23.5–46.5) days during the two observation periods. …”

Drebrin regulates RMS neuroblast migration <i>in vitro</i>. by Martina Sonego (481270)

“…Scale bars: 50 μm.</p>…”

Mast cell activation occurs at 3 days of cuprizone administration. by John Shelestak (8490477)

“…<i>n</i> = 30 (mean ± s.e.m.). Scale bar = 50 μm, Asterisk denotes significance (<i>p</i> = < 0.05) F) Western blot analysis of cortical Tryptase at 3 days of cuprizone administration. …”

The hARD1 NLS mutant suppresses cell proliferation. by Ji-Hyeon Park (554738)

“…Arrows indicate cells with altered morphology (black, enlarged; red, rounded). Scale bar, 50 µm. <b>B</b> and <b>C</b>. hARD1ΔN-expressing cells showed a marked decrease in cell growth. …”

ARPE-19 cells were treated with either room-air or CSE (10%) with appropriate treatments of cysteamine (250 μM) or fisetin (40 μM). by Viren Kumar Govindaraju (4326025)

Long-term impact of changing childhood malnutrition on rotavirus diarrhoea: Two decades of adjusted association with climate and socio-demographic factors from urban Bangladesh by Sumon Kumar Das (289906)

“…In the adjusted model, a decrease in monthly proportion of underweight [coef.: -0.189 (95% CI:-0.376, -0.003)] and wasting [-0.265 (-0.455, -0.075)] were significantly and inversely associated with rotavirus infection. …”

Temporal Trend in Young-Onset Type 2 Diabetes - the Macrovascular and Mortality Risk: Study of UK Primary Care Electronic Medical Records by Digsu N. Koye (8881108)

“…The incidence rates of ASCVD and ACM declined in people aged ≥50 years, but did not decrease in people <50 years. Compared to people aged ≥50 years, those aged 18-39 years at diagnosis had higher obesity (71% obese), higher HbA1c (8.6%), 71% had high LDL-C, while only 18% were on cardio-protective therapy. …”

Image 5_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.png by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”

Image 9_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”

Image 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.jpeg by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”

Image 2_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”

Image 8_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”

Image 7_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”

Image 10_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”

Image 4_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”