Showing 13,941 - 13,960 results of 16,851 for search '(( 59 ((0 decrease) OR (a decrease)) ) OR ( 50 ((mean decrease) OR (teer decrease)) ))', query time: 0.51s Refine Results
  1. 13941

    <i>In vivo</i> therapeutic effects of Ce6-mediated PDT on live and heat-killed <i>P</i>. <i>acnes</i>-induced inflammation. by Yoon-Young Wang (3694624)

    Published 2017
    “…Right ear received an equal amount of PBS serving as a control. Ce6 (1, 25 and 50 μg/ml in PBS) was epicutaneously applied on the left ear. …”
  2. 13942
  3. 13943

    PTPRM, link to tumour grade, nodal status, TNM staging and clinical outcomes of breast cancer. by Ping-Hui Sun (118782)

    Published 2012
    “…<p>A, PTPRM transcripts were decreased in the moderately and poorly differentiated cancer cells in comparison with well-differentiated tumour cells. …”
  4. 13944
  5. 13945
  6. 13946
  7. 13947
  8. 13948
  9. 13949
  10. 13950

    Evaluation results. by Briya Tariq (19666901)

    Published 2024
    “…The images were subsequently reconstructed into five energy bins: 7-40, 40-50, 50-60, 60-79, and 79-118 keV. Evaluation metrics including signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), linearity of attenuation profiles, root mean square error (RMSE), and area under the curve (AUC) were employed to assess the energy and material-density images with and without metal inserts. …”
  11. 13951
  12. 13952
  13. 13953

    Image7_An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of early oral feeding vs. traditional oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery.tif by Dong Xu (21616)

    Published 2024
    “…Hospital days [weighted mean difference (WMD), −1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), −2.14 to −1.30; p<0.00001), the time to first flatus (WMD, −0.72; 95% CI, −0.99 to −0.46; p<0.00001), and hospital costs (WMD, −3.78; 95% CI, −4.50 to −3.05; p<0.00001) were significantly decreased in the EOF group. …”
  14. 13954

    Image8_An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of early oral feeding vs. traditional oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery.tif by Dong Xu (21616)

    Published 2024
    “…Hospital days [weighted mean difference (WMD), −1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), −2.14 to −1.30; p<0.00001), the time to first flatus (WMD, −0.72; 95% CI, −0.99 to −0.46; p<0.00001), and hospital costs (WMD, −3.78; 95% CI, −4.50 to −3.05; p<0.00001) were significantly decreased in the EOF group. …”
  15. 13955
  16. 13956

    Enhanced proliferation inhibition in TKI-resistant cell lines after sitravatinib treatment. by Melissa Dolan (7114667)

    Published 2019
    “…Proliferation curves (left panel) were used to calculate IC50 values (right panel). Proliferation values were normalized to DMSO-treated vehicle controls. …”
  17. 13957

    Dataset with steel insert. by Briya Tariq (19666901)

    Published 2024
    “…The images were subsequently reconstructed into five energy bins: 7-40, 40-50, 50-60, 60-79, and 79-118 keV. Evaluation metrics including signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), linearity of attenuation profiles, root mean square error (RMSE), and area under the curve (AUC) were employed to assess the energy and material-density images with and without metal inserts. …”
  18. 13958

    Reference dataset. by Briya Tariq (19666901)

    Published 2024
    “…The images were subsequently reconstructed into five energy bins: 7-40, 40-50, 50-60, 60-79, and 79-118 keV. Evaluation metrics including signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), linearity of attenuation profiles, root mean square error (RMSE), and area under the curve (AUC) were employed to assess the energy and material-density images with and without metal inserts. …”
  19. 13959

    Absence of glial activation and cell death with SB-3CT treatment. by Jung-A Shin (3179265)

    Published 2016
    “…P, postnatal; D, days; wk, week; N, normal; ONL, outer nuclear layer; OPL, outer plexiform layer; INL, inner nuclear layer; IPL, inner plexiform layer; GCL, ganglion cell layer; NFL, nerve fiber layer. Scale bar = 50 um. Data are presented as mean + SEM. The symbol * and ** indicates p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively.…”
  20. 13960

    Image9_An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of early oral feeding vs. traditional oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery.tif by Dong Xu (21616)

    Published 2024
    “…Hospital days [weighted mean difference (WMD), −1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), −2.14 to −1.30; p<0.00001), the time to first flatus (WMD, −0.72; 95% CI, −0.99 to −0.46; p<0.00001), and hospital costs (WMD, −3.78; 95% CI, −4.50 to −3.05; p<0.00001) were significantly decreased in the EOF group. …”