Search alternatives:
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
0 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
0 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
13941
<i>In vivo</i> therapeutic effects of Ce6-mediated PDT on live and heat-killed <i>P</i>. <i>acnes</i>-induced inflammation.
Published 2017“…Right ear received an equal amount of PBS serving as a control. Ce6 (1, 25 and 50 μg/ml in PBS) was epicutaneously applied on the left ear. …”
-
13942
-
13943
PTPRM, link to tumour grade, nodal status, TNM staging and clinical outcomes of breast cancer.
Published 2012“…<p>A, PTPRM transcripts were decreased in the moderately and poorly differentiated cancer cells in comparison with well-differentiated tumour cells. …”
-
13944
-
13945
-
13946
-
13947
-
13948
-
13949
-
13950
Evaluation results.
Published 2024“…The images were subsequently reconstructed into five energy bins: 7-40, 40-50, 50-60, 60-79, and 79-118 keV. Evaluation metrics including signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), linearity of attenuation profiles, root mean square error (RMSE), and area under the curve (AUC) were employed to assess the energy and material-density images with and without metal inserts. …”
-
13951
-
13952
-
13953
Image7_An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of early oral feeding vs. traditional oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery.tif
Published 2024“…Hospital days [weighted mean difference (WMD), −1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), −2.14 to −1.30; p<0.00001), the time to first flatus (WMD, −0.72; 95% CI, −0.99 to −0.46; p<0.00001), and hospital costs (WMD, −3.78; 95% CI, −4.50 to −3.05; p<0.00001) were significantly decreased in the EOF group. …”
-
13954
Image8_An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of early oral feeding vs. traditional oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery.tif
Published 2024“…Hospital days [weighted mean difference (WMD), −1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), −2.14 to −1.30; p<0.00001), the time to first flatus (WMD, −0.72; 95% CI, −0.99 to −0.46; p<0.00001), and hospital costs (WMD, −3.78; 95% CI, −4.50 to −3.05; p<0.00001) were significantly decreased in the EOF group. …”
-
13955
-
13956
Enhanced proliferation inhibition in TKI-resistant cell lines after sitravatinib treatment.
Published 2019“…Proliferation curves (left panel) were used to calculate IC50 values (right panel). Proliferation values were normalized to DMSO-treated vehicle controls. …”
-
13957
Dataset with steel insert.
Published 2024“…The images were subsequently reconstructed into five energy bins: 7-40, 40-50, 50-60, 60-79, and 79-118 keV. Evaluation metrics including signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), linearity of attenuation profiles, root mean square error (RMSE), and area under the curve (AUC) were employed to assess the energy and material-density images with and without metal inserts. …”
-
13958
Reference dataset.
Published 2024“…The images were subsequently reconstructed into five energy bins: 7-40, 40-50, 50-60, 60-79, and 79-118 keV. Evaluation metrics including signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), linearity of attenuation profiles, root mean square error (RMSE), and area under the curve (AUC) were employed to assess the energy and material-density images with and without metal inserts. …”
-
13959
Absence of glial activation and cell death with SB-3CT treatment.
Published 2016“…P, postnatal; D, days; wk, week; N, normal; ONL, outer nuclear layer; OPL, outer plexiform layer; INL, inner nuclear layer; IPL, inner plexiform layer; GCL, ganglion cell layer; NFL, nerve fiber layer. Scale bar = 50 um. Data are presented as mean + SEM. The symbol * and ** indicates p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively.…”
-
13960
Image9_An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of early oral feeding vs. traditional oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery.tif
Published 2024“…Hospital days [weighted mean difference (WMD), −1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), −2.14 to −1.30; p<0.00001), the time to first flatus (WMD, −0.72; 95% CI, −0.99 to −0.46; p<0.00001), and hospital costs (WMD, −3.78; 95% CI, −4.50 to −3.05; p<0.00001) were significantly decreased in the EOF group. …”