Search alternatives:
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
0 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
0 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
12981
-
12982
-
12983
-
12984
-
12985
-
12986
-
12987
-
12988
-
12989
-
12990
Increases in turbidity reduce territory defense and exploration in an East African cichlid (<i>Neolamprologus pulcher</i>)
Published 2025“…</p><h2><b>Experimental procedure</b></h2><p dir="ltr">We haphazardly selected 36 individuals (18 females, mean ± SD standard length: 5.54 ± 0.72 cm; 18 males, 5.41 ± 0.53 cm) from various stock tanks. …”
-
12991
-
12992
-
12993
-
12994
-
12995
-
12996
-
12997
Characterization of super carbonate apatite (sCA).
Published 2015“…The smaller nanoparticle size ranged from 7 to 50 nm (mean ± SD: 14.8 ± 5.66 nm). The percentage of smaller nanoparticles among the whole sCA+0.5% albumin nanoparticles was calculated to be 99.7% in particle numbers. …”
-
12998
Reduced VEGF lowers surfactant production.
Published 2016“…Scale bars represent 50 μm. Data are expressed as mean ± SD, *P<0.05.…”
-
12999
Significant influences of forest features on absolute treatment effects (inside the fence–outside the fence), i.e. the difference.
Published 2019“…<p>Positive values indicate increased response variables in fenced plots, negative values indicate decreased response values in fenced plots. We see (a) difference of species richness of herbs against relative conifer cover (b) difference of species richness of herbs against mean DBH of the 50 largest trees (c) difference of cover of herbs (all herbs estimated together) against relative conifer cover (d) difference of diversity of herbs (exp(H)) against initial cover of herbs (summed cover of individual species measured independent of treatment plots in spring and summer, resulting in values ranging from 0.1–266) (e) difference of evenness of shrubs against canopy cover.…”
-
13000