Image4_An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of early oral feeding vs. traditional oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery.tif by Dong Xu (21616)

“…Hospital days [weighted mean difference (WMD), −1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), −2.14 to −1.30; p<0.00001), the time to first flatus (WMD, −0.72; 95% CI, −0.99 to −0.46; p<0.00001), and hospital costs (WMD, −3.78; 95% CI, −4.50 to −3.05; p<0.00001) were significantly decreased in the EOF group. …”

Adaptations in antagonist co-activation: Role in the repeated-bout effect by Robert E. Hight (4669807)

“…The relationship between mean firing rate (MFR) of each motor-unit and its recruitment threshold (RT) was examined using linear regression. …”

Figure 1 raw data by Urban Bezeljak (8372241)

“…Shown are average curves from 50 individual runs in bold and 10 random traces per condition. …”

The salivary microbiome is altered in the presence of a high salivary glucose concentration by J. Max Goodson (469397)

Table_1_Effectiveness and safety of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes: evidence from a retrospective real-world study.docx by Yan Jiang (12139)

Table1_Endovascular treatment of aortic coarctation using covered balloon-expandable stents—a systematic review and meta-analysis.pdf by Fei He (145896)

Dataset with aluminium insert. by Briya Tariq (19666901)

“…The images were subsequently reconstructed into five energy bins: 7-40, 40-50, 50-60, 60-79, and 79-118 keV. Evaluation metrics including signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), linearity of attenuation profiles, root mean square error (RMSE), and area under the curve (AUC) were employed to assess the energy and material-density images with and without metal inserts. …”

Ntf3 expression levels influence gap detection thresholds in broadband background noise. by Lingchao Ji (14589524)

“…In contrast, in the GAP trials, a silent gap in the background noise of variable length (0–50 ms) was presented ending 50 ms before the startle stimulus (S). …”

Obese <i>Ugcg</i>^{f/f//CamKCreERT2} mice are initially slightly hyperphagic and show hypometabolism and hypothermia. by Viola Nordström (388258)

Image1_An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of early oral feeding vs. traditional oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery.tif by Dong Xu (21616)

“…Hospital days [weighted mean difference (WMD), −1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), −2.14 to −1.30; p<0.00001), the time to first flatus (WMD, −0.72; 95% CI, −0.99 to −0.46; p<0.00001), and hospital costs (WMD, −3.78; 95% CI, −4.50 to −3.05; p<0.00001) were significantly decreased in the EOF group. …”

Table_1_Craniometric determinants of the fitted filtration efficiency of disposable masks.DOCX by Jacob S. Griffin (19446352)

“…</p>Methods<p>One-hundred participants (50 men, 50 women) visited the Environmental Protection Agency’s Human Studies Facility in Chapel Hill, NC between 2022-2023. …”

Evolution in the total number of confirmed infections across multiple countries and simulated settings. by Vincenzo G. Fiore (10510274)

Image6_An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of early oral feeding vs. traditional oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery.tif by Dong Xu (21616)

“…Hospital days [weighted mean difference (WMD), −1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), −2.14 to −1.30; p<0.00001), the time to first flatus (WMD, −0.72; 95% CI, −0.99 to −0.46; p<0.00001), and hospital costs (WMD, −3.78; 95% CI, −4.50 to −3.05; p<0.00001) were significantly decreased in the EOF group. …”

Pathological analyses of <i>GBA</i>^-/- medaka. by Norihito Uemura (716962)

“…For all analyses, data are the mean ± SEM.</p>…”

Image5_An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of early oral feeding vs. traditional oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery.tif by Dong Xu (21616)

“…Hospital days [weighted mean difference (WMD), −1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), −2.14 to −1.30; p<0.00001), the time to first flatus (WMD, −0.72; 95% CI, −0.99 to −0.46; p<0.00001), and hospital costs (WMD, −3.78; 95% CI, −4.50 to −3.05; p<0.00001) were significantly decreased in the EOF group. …”

Image2_An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of early oral feeding vs. traditional oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery.tif by Dong Xu (21616)

“…Hospital days [weighted mean difference (WMD), −1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), −2.14 to −1.30; p<0.00001), the time to first flatus (WMD, −0.72; 95% CI, −0.99 to −0.46; p<0.00001), and hospital costs (WMD, −3.78; 95% CI, −4.50 to −3.05; p<0.00001) were significantly decreased in the EOF group. …”

Table 6_Global burden of amputation among children and adolescents from 1990 to 2021: systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease study 2021.xlsx by Tao Zhang (43681)

Image 11_Global burden of amputation among children and adolescents from 1990 to 2021: systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease study 2021.png by Tao Zhang (43681)

Table 1_Global burden of amputation among children and adolescents from 1990 to 2021: systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease study 2021.xlsx by Tao Zhang (43681)

Image 9_Global burden of amputation among children and adolescents from 1990 to 2021: systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease study 2021.png by Tao Zhang (43681)