Showing 18,801 - 18,820 results of 24,164 for search '(( 59 ((0 decrease) OR (a decrease)) ) OR ( 50 ((we decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ))', query time: 0.68s Refine Results
  1. 18801

    Dataset with aluminium insert. by Briya Tariq (19666901)

    Published 2024
    “…The images were subsequently reconstructed into five energy bins: 7-40, 40-50, 50-60, 60-79, and 79-118 keV. Evaluation metrics including signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), linearity of attenuation profiles, root mean square error (RMSE), and area under the curve (AUC) were employed to assess the energy and material-density images with and without metal inserts. …”
  2. 18802

    Ntf3 expression levels influence gap detection thresholds in broadband background noise. by Lingchao Ji (14589524)

    Published 2024
    “…In contrast, in the GAP trials, a silent gap in the background noise of variable length (0–50 ms) was presented ending 50 ms before the startle stimulus (S). …”
  3. 18803
  4. 18804

    Image1_An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of early oral feeding vs. traditional oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery.tif by Dong Xu (21616)

    Published 2024
    “…Hospital days [weighted mean difference (WMD), −1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), −2.14 to −1.30; p<0.00001), the time to first flatus (WMD, −0.72; 95% CI, −0.99 to −0.46; p<0.00001), and hospital costs (WMD, −3.78; 95% CI, −4.50 to −3.05; p<0.00001) were significantly decreased in the EOF group. …”
  5. 18805
  6. 18806

    Image6_An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of early oral feeding vs. traditional oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery.tif by Dong Xu (21616)

    Published 2024
    “…Hospital days [weighted mean difference (WMD), −1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), −2.14 to −1.30; p<0.00001), the time to first flatus (WMD, −0.72; 95% CI, −0.99 to −0.46; p<0.00001), and hospital costs (WMD, −3.78; 95% CI, −4.50 to −3.05; p<0.00001) were significantly decreased in the EOF group. …”
  7. 18807

    Pathological analyses of <i>GBA</i><sup>-/-</sup> medaka. by Norihito Uemura (716962)

    Published 2015
    “…For all analyses, data are the mean ± SEM.</p>…”
  8. 18808

    Image5_An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of early oral feeding vs. traditional oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery.tif by Dong Xu (21616)

    Published 2024
    “…Hospital days [weighted mean difference (WMD), −1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), −2.14 to −1.30; p<0.00001), the time to first flatus (WMD, −0.72; 95% CI, −0.99 to −0.46; p<0.00001), and hospital costs (WMD, −3.78; 95% CI, −4.50 to −3.05; p<0.00001) were significantly decreased in the EOF group. …”
  9. 18809

    Image2_An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of early oral feeding vs. traditional oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery.tif by Dong Xu (21616)

    Published 2024
    “…Hospital days [weighted mean difference (WMD), −1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), −2.14 to −1.30; p<0.00001), the time to first flatus (WMD, −0.72; 95% CI, −0.99 to −0.46; p<0.00001), and hospital costs (WMD, −3.78; 95% CI, −4.50 to −3.05; p<0.00001) were significantly decreased in the EOF group. …”
  10. 18810
  11. 18811
  12. 18812
  13. 18813
  14. 18814
  15. 18815
  16. 18816
  17. 18817
  18. 18818
  19. 18819
  20. 18820