Search alternatives:
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
0 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
0 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
18801
Dataset with aluminium insert.
Published 2024“…The images were subsequently reconstructed into five energy bins: 7-40, 40-50, 50-60, 60-79, and 79-118 keV. Evaluation metrics including signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), linearity of attenuation profiles, root mean square error (RMSE), and area under the curve (AUC) were employed to assess the energy and material-density images with and without metal inserts. …”
-
18802
Ntf3 expression levels influence gap detection thresholds in broadband background noise.
Published 2024“…In contrast, in the GAP trials, a silent gap in the background noise of variable length (0–50 ms) was presented ending 50 ms before the startle stimulus (S). …”
-
18803
-
18804
Image1_An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of early oral feeding vs. traditional oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery.tif
Published 2024“…Hospital days [weighted mean difference (WMD), −1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), −2.14 to −1.30; p<0.00001), the time to first flatus (WMD, −0.72; 95% CI, −0.99 to −0.46; p<0.00001), and hospital costs (WMD, −3.78; 95% CI, −4.50 to −3.05; p<0.00001) were significantly decreased in the EOF group. …”
-
18805
-
18806
Image6_An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of early oral feeding vs. traditional oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery.tif
Published 2024“…Hospital days [weighted mean difference (WMD), −1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), −2.14 to −1.30; p<0.00001), the time to first flatus (WMD, −0.72; 95% CI, −0.99 to −0.46; p<0.00001), and hospital costs (WMD, −3.78; 95% CI, −4.50 to −3.05; p<0.00001) were significantly decreased in the EOF group. …”
-
18807
Pathological analyses of <i>GBA</i><sup>-/-</sup> medaka.
Published 2015“…For all analyses, data are the mean ± SEM.</p>…”
-
18808
Image5_An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of early oral feeding vs. traditional oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery.tif
Published 2024“…Hospital days [weighted mean difference (WMD), −1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), −2.14 to −1.30; p<0.00001), the time to first flatus (WMD, −0.72; 95% CI, −0.99 to −0.46; p<0.00001), and hospital costs (WMD, −3.78; 95% CI, −4.50 to −3.05; p<0.00001) were significantly decreased in the EOF group. …”
-
18809
Image2_An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of early oral feeding vs. traditional oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery.tif
Published 2024“…Hospital days [weighted mean difference (WMD), −1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), −2.14 to −1.30; p<0.00001), the time to first flatus (WMD, −0.72; 95% CI, −0.99 to −0.46; p<0.00001), and hospital costs (WMD, −3.78; 95% CI, −4.50 to −3.05; p<0.00001) were significantly decreased in the EOF group. …”
-
18810
-
18811
-
18812
-
18813
-
18814
-
18815
-
18816
-
18817
-
18818
-
18819
-
18820